I'd like to see more in the pbp that would give a view of some of the variables involved for any given play, from the players' attributes to the sets to the IQs to the positioning. Maybe just one or two of the significant factors on each play. Then you could determine why things were happening, and then make adjustments to game plans and team construction. Instead, you get a small sampling each game and left to wonder if you got SIM'd, outcoached or outclassed. (There's a little bit of this already, for instance being open against the press.)
"Jones outmuscles Smith, gets inside and scores" -- if you kept reading that, you could determine that you're getting beat Athletically.
"Anderson has a relatively open look due to the sag, but doesn't seem to have his legs under him and the shot comes up a little short." -- Anderson was facing a -3, but his tiredness affected the shot.
or even occasional color commentary not related to any particular play
"The youth of Florida is really showing." low IQs have had impact
"Georgia has been getting good looks, they're just not dropping" - RNG has been brutal