For walks, the hitter influence is 56.5% to 43.5% for pitchers. As caps get higher, team walk totals will rise, so it makes sense that walks are more frequent at higher caps. I don't think it's anywhere near problematic, unbalanced levels though. It's still easy to find excellent BB numbers from pitchers even up to $255M. I'm in a $220M league where '08 Walsh and '08 Brown have BB/9 numbers in the low 2's, and '16 Kershaw is at a microscopic 0.84. In a different $182M league Walsh is at 1.85 BB/9 and Kershaw 0.87. Many years ago, it was totally normal to see even the best Joss and Maddux seasons with BB/9 numbers in the 4's and 5's at the highest caps.
Scoring at high caps is way, way down from where it was several years ago and prior, when I'd be thrilled if '15 Alexander or '08 Joss would have an ERA in the 5's or 6's. When I used to play $255M caps in Coors, my goal was for my starters to have ERA's under 9.00. Now we can see ERA's of entire staffs in the 4's or better.