About the team names: I noticed that I’d worked Roman numerals into the first two teams I built, but not with any purpose. So I decided to find a way to get them into all of the names. If you don’t know Roman numerals, it’s OK because they’re not particularly clever names anyway. And I apologize for the long writeups. Was it Twain who said he didn’t have time to write a short letter so he wrote a long one instead? I’m good at editing other people’s work, but I can’t hack my own prose once I’ve created it.
$70M: The Worst Picks First (Again)
LXX Victories Maximum
I’ve had little success at low caps, and the $65M was my worst R1 team by far. To get better this time I looked at some good rosters in my R1 league and a few in a low-cap TOC by veteran owners and try to figure out how those teams did well. I looked at the $/PA and $/IP from the seasons they picked and some of their key players. Pitchers parks seemed popular. As did switch hitters. Some speedy contact guys. Pitchers who don’t waste money on strikeouts and limit walks. So, after scrapping about 10-12 players the other division teams took, I tried to recreate success with something close to that formula.
I couldn’t find enough guys in the salary range who could get on base with speed and decent defense, so I sacrificed on the latter two. I’ve got 6 switch-hitters in the lineup. I steered clear of homers (only 48 RL). All the starters have OBP of .370+ so hopefully that keeps enough activity on the bases. Only two guys with good speed, though. That might hurt. Key hitters will be Roger Connor (.952 OPS), Chick Stahl (.905) and Mitchell Page (.926). Have always wanted to use that ‘77 Page and it fit here. I went very low on PA, because why not try to milk it? No one on the bench over 500K.
The rotation is headed by 3 similar guys from the 19-aughts, Pelty, Powell and Garvin, and the similar 81 Rick Honeycutt. Grabbed a few relievers with good IP/G for spot starting. I like to have at least 4 guys to work the late innings effectively and probably won’t designate a closer here. ‘69 Joe Hoerner seems likely to get a lot of the saves.
Ballpark: My pitchers won’t give up many homers anyway, but since I won’t be hitting them at all I went with Target Field. I’ve actually never used it, but it fit the bill here.
Starters: C Wally Schang 1915, 1B Roger Connor 1894, 2B Miller Huggins 1912, SS Billy Rogell 1938, 3B Roy Cullenbine 1942, OF Mitchell Page 1977, Billy North 1975, Chick Stahl 1897. Rotation: Barney Pelty 1905, Jack Powell 1907, Ned Garvin 1902, Rick Honeycutt 1981. Bullpen Keys: Joe Benz 1917, Tot Pressnell 1940, Rube Marquard 1919, Joe Hoerner 1969
5271 PA .292/.387/.416 232 2B, 91 3B, 48 HR, 187/122 SB/CS $36.16M
1433 IP .243 OAVG, 1.13 WHIP, 2.84 ERA 533K-322 BB 46 HR $33.83M
Outlook: We might not be as terrible as I think, but I doubt we prove jmissirlis a prophet either. My team name predicts we can’t top 70 wins, and with this competition and my low-cap struggles I’ll be surprised if we do much better than that. I’d be thrilled to flirt with .500.
$90M: Pentagon Franchise Puzzle
XC Losses Minimum
I’ve got the Red Sox, Yankees, Cubs, Dodgers and Braves. I saved this for last because I had no idea how to start. I found a few SP who fit the cap range and started looking for team pairings that would fit. I aimed for teams with long histories to maximize my choices. I didn’t find the BB-Ref tool as useful as I expected and just searched desirable stat ranges for players who might fit the teams I picked. I built the whole pitching staff except a couple filler spots and then made the hitting work around the team restrictions I’d created. I never tried to make a second team with a different combo, and though I might have had time I just decided to let it ride.
I skimped a lot on PA again, but eventually I added some after worrying that a hitters’ park could mess me up. No hitter cost as much as $6M as I went for a little more depth. I ended up with minimal speed again, alas. I would have preferred more range, too; I have a low error infield with C range and two stiffs in the outfield corners.
I’ve got a few big 2B hitters, including the ridiculous ‘31 Earl Webb, whom I’ve never used. Seemed like a Sox doubles machine in Fenway made sense anyway. ‘36 Ben Chapman has a little speed and big 2B ability atop the lineup. A nod to the modern era in the infield, with 2017 Freddie Freeman and Corey Seager making the cut along with 2012 Dustin Pedroia and 1991 Wade Boggs. I used 1977 Reggie Smith in one of my first open leagues and he was tremendous, so hopefully he can provide some thunder at this cap, too. He doesn’t really get enough 2B to be a perfect fit, but he was one of my favorite players as a kid with that high bat wave stance so I went with him anyway.
I started my pitching staff with Maddux, because he could pair a Braves season with Dodgers or Cubs. Roger Clemens gave me a Bos-NYY option. Burt Hooton was good for me in a R1 league so I brought him back as a LA-ChC combo. Whitey Ford is my lifetime Yankee. It wasn’t hard to find a handful of good relievers who played for these teams, and I’ve got Kimbrel, Chapman and Smoltz in there as finishers. I went as low as I’ve ever gone on innings with 1409 in a hitters park. But I’m playing with house money here, so why not try to maximize the talent and hope for the best?
Ballpark: I decided on Fenway to maximize the doubles, because the other options with these teams just didn’t fit. But I am worried about fatigue causing some grief.
Starters: C Walker Cooper 1950, 1B Freddie Freeman 2017, 2B Dustin Pedroia 2012, SS Corey Seager 2017, 3B Wade Boggs 1991, OF Earl Webb 1931, Ben Chapman 1936, Reggie Smith 1977. Rotation: Greg Maddux 1993, Roger Clemens 1991, Whitey Ford 1964, Burt Hooton 1975. Bullpen Keys: John Smoltz 2002, Craig Kimbrel 2013, Aroldis Chapman 2016, Mike Stanton 1991
5404 PA .304/.386/.487 344 2B, 31 3B, 152 HR, 67/36 SB/CS $44.30M
1409 IP .222 OAVG, 1.07 WHIP, 2.59 ERA 1154K-357 BB 82 HR $45.69M
Outlook: The team name is another prediction, this time for 90 losses. I hope that’s an exaggeration, but I’m sure other people are far more skilled at fine-tuning rosters for this cap level. In a less competitive group of owners, I’d feel decent about this group’s playoff chances though.
$100M: Round 1 Blacklist
MMCMVL Fewer Choices
I started on this one early, painstakingly going through potential draftees and then scrolling endlessly through the blacklist in hope of finding some options. It was a very slow build, that’s for sure. The fun part is I’m using almost entirely players I’ve never used, and that pushed me to look at different potential strategies. I wanted a park that favored something strongly, and the result was Triples with a +3 in Chase Field. So I have a speedy team with great range going, a total departure from the 70M and 90M squads. And what a relief to punch in the roster checker and get a green light, too. Would have been easy to miss a name in there.
I poured almost every penny of offense into the starters and went ultra-cheap on the bench. The lineup has some major speed with Harry Stovey (100), Bid McPhee (96) and Jake Stenzel (93). Elmer Smith is a triples machine, along with Stenzel and McPhee. Hal Trosky can hit it out if we face enough modern pitching. Catcher was by far the hardest to fill, with virtually everyone I could imagine using blacklisted. Settled for Alex Avila with a B arm and some pop. Infield defense is big on range, with A+ at 2B-SS-3B, plus Stovey in CF. Trosky is the only guy here I’ve ever used, but he raked in the 2 HOF league for me.
Dave Davenport (414 IP) and Spud Chandler (267) will top the rotation. I had to save some money on the third starter, so Dummy Taylor is a bit of a gamble here. There were at least a few reasonable options for starters. I considered Ed Seward’s 632 innings but was concerned I wouldn’t manage it well enough and Davenport appears very close in skill at a good bit lower $/IP. Looks like a few people are using Seward, but happy to see schwarze endorse Davenport! None of my starters give up homers, and the whole roster only allowed 31 in 1462 IP. The bullpen was a tougher group to set with virtually all the top seasons blacklisted. My backend guys are lower in innings than I usually prefer, so my starters have to go deep in this league. Grant Balfour and Alex Torres are very hard to hit, but they do give up walks and might be tricky to keep fresh.
Ballpark: My Chase Field pick was based on the +3 triples, and I think I got a lineup that’s pretty well-suited for it. Not a high-strikeout pitching staff, so my great range defenders have to be on the ball. I’m worried they’ll make a lot of errors, though.
Starters: C Alex Avila 2011, 1B Hal Trosky 1934, 2B Bid McPhee 1887, SS Glenn Wright 1930, 3B Buddy Lewis 1939, OF Elmer Smith 1894, Harry Stovey 1886, Jake Stenzel 1894. Rotation: Dave Davenport 1915, Spud Chandler 1943, Dummy Taylor 1904. Bullpen Keys: Grant Balfour 2008, Alex Torres 2013, Mike Gonzalez 2004.
5801 PA .315/.388/.504 299 2B, 130 3B, 136 HR, 335/166 SB/CS $49.95M
1462 IP .216 OAVG, 1.03 WHIP, 2.17 ERA 828K-372 BB 31 HR $50.04M
Outlook: Like the other leagues above, I’d feel decently about this team among lesser competition. But I know you guys have dug deeper into the player pool before and will likely emerge with better hidden gems than I did. If I nailed the speed-range-triples thing, this could be a team that surprises me with a decent run. It might be my best shot at the playoffs.
$110M: Wait & See, pt. 2
Wait and CX
Yeah, this was how the Roman numerals got started. C = 100, so Wait and CX just sounded good. I had set up a full roster before R1 just to make sure all the parts fit together in a workable team. I changed 9 of my initially planned hitter seasons and tinkered it into a better team now. Not good enough to give me much confidence, though. I suspect this will be one of my lowest finishers.
Part of my problem with this team is that I boxed myself into needing to use a Ruth season at 1B unless I moved Cobb there instead, but those options didn’t add up. I got torched by Ruth’s terrible range in the 255M league, and at least a D+ season won’t be quite so bad. My other biggest challenge was finding a Schmidt season at 3B I could squeeze in, instead of using (as originally planned) a Dave Hollins season there and a terrible wasted 172PA Schmidt on the bench. I downgraded my Mantle and Cobb seasons to make it work, so the lineup is a little deeper if not exactly fearsome. Cobb’s the only great average hitter, and I worry about the sluggers being neutralized by deadball arms. There is a lot of speed, but the defense is barely mediocre.
On the pitching side at least, I stuck with my original plan. Johnson-Maddux-Pedro is a solid rotation topper, but I’ve moved Eck into the rotation this time with an OK ‘85 season. Walsh moves to the pen with his 29-inning season instead. Still a formidable set of seasons for Kimbrel-Adams-Uehara, with a weaker Kuo by a lot though. When I tinkered with the hitting, I slashed my innings from 1510 to 1432, which barely feels sufficient.
Ballpark: I went fairly neutral with Forbes in R1 and just have to live with it now. But it’s not a lineup that favors any extreme anyway, so it might be OK.
Starters: C King Kelly 1888, 1B Babe Ruth 1922, 2B Joe Morgan 1977, SS Lou Boudreau 1943, 3B Mike Schmidt 1986, OF Ty Cobb 1925, Mickey Mantle 1952, Hugh Duffy 1890. Rotation: Walter Johnson 1919, Greg Maddux 1993, Pedro Martinez 2002, Dennis Eckersley 1985. Bullpen Keys: Craig Kimbrel 2017, Mike Adams 2011, Ed Walsh 1915, Koji Uehara 2011.
5765 PA .305/.397/.495 269 2B, 83 3B, 168 HR, 243/126 SB/CS $54.42M
1432 IP .209 OAVG, 0.96 WHIP, 2.08 ERA 1227K-284 BB 65HR $55.51M
Outlook: The more I look at this team, the less I like it. Don’t do anything particularly well. The pitching is not much better than my 90M or 100M teams (have 93 Maddux in this and the 90M, so that might not be ideal). The hitting isn’t much better either. Probably a last-place team in this tournament.
$130M: Law of Averages
MCMLI
What a difference $20M makes! This team can actually hit and pitch and might even be pretty decent. I built this one first, and with the help of my trusty calculator managed to get what I wanted the first time around. I have no players from the 1950s at all. Only one from the 60s, two from the 40s, none from the 30s or 70s, two from the 20s, and one from the 80s. As it turned out, the averaging came from the extremes. I have 9 from pre-1920 and 10 from 1997-present. I’ll be curious if some people have a better historical mix.
Pitching was easier to average out, because a few modern relievers balanced well with a few deadball starters. I feel pretty good about the Mathewson-Alexander-Brown-Kershaw rotation. I’ll have a great arm out there every game. Plenty of reliable short relievers, so I feel covered there too. I went a little heavier on innings because of the park and cap, but I don’t think I wasted any money either.
This lineup is going to produce. Five guys hit .360+ (Browning, Speaker, Connor, Gwynn, Lajoie) and the team average is .352. Lots of doubles and triples up and down the lineup and some reasonable speed in there. Lots of A+ range too, so I feel like it’s as complete a team as any of these. It’s built for what I expect will be a lot of similar deadball pitching and I think it’s probably a better offense than my 140M team actually.
Ballpark: I needed to maximize the singles and doubles for sure, with little interest in helping homers. League Park II gives me +2 1B and +3 2B along with -2 HR, all of which suit the lineup well. I wouldn’t have minded boosting 3B, but I preferred minimizing the homers from other teams.
Starters: C Wally Schang 1926/Brent Mayne 1999, 1B Roger Connor 1885, 2B Nap Lajoie 1902, SS Carlos Guillen 2004, 3B Frank Baker 1913, OF Pete Browning 1887, Tris Speaker 1913, Tony Gwynn 1997. Rotation: Christy Mathewson 1908, Pete Alexander 1919, Mordecai Brown 1904, Clayton Kershaw 2016. Bullpen Keys: Kenley Jansen 2016, Andrew Miller 2014, Johnny Niggeling 1943, Steve Ontiveros 1985, Babe Adams 1924.
5758 PA .352/.415/.514 363 2B, 101 3B, 88 HR, 338/217 SB/CS $65.27M
1491 IP .196 OAVG, 0.87 WHIP, 1.67 ERA 990K-248 BB 33HR $64.71M
Outlook: There is ample danger in having any confidence at all in this tournament, so I cautiously and optimistically selected this as the team I think will do best. I did better in this cap range in R1 than in the low and high ones, so maybe with a little luck in division draw I’ll be competitive.
$140M: Live by the Sword…
There’s an LVI in Elvis
This was definitely a fun theme to test out different combinations and figure out how to allocate salary effectively. Inevitably, you have to waste a little, I think, but as I compare this with my 130M team I’m not sure it’s anywhere close to $10M better. So that could be a sign I should have kept digging for better options.
The 25th guy is really the linchpin of this theme, IMO, because of his salary level and the ballpark. I toyed around with a few possibilities before deciding on 2017 Elvis Andrus. I used him once in the DEAL because his range was amazing, and he has speed and power. It worked out pretty well, and he comes with a park that adds a lot of offense, too. At $7.25M, he is high enough to allow me to use a player in two lineup spots, which you need at least one of basically. Also, the middle three letters of Elvis are an actual Roman numeral (not that 16 means anything, but don’t burst my bubble).
I decided pretty quickly on pairs of Tris Speaker and Pete Browning, because they had sub-1M seasons available. Switch-hitting Duke Farrell backs himself up behind the plate and makes a great PH. The ‘02 Lajoie with 459 PA pairs well with the less productive ‘05 (286 PA), who will play against LH to benefit a bit from the platoon advantage.
My toughest final choices were 3B and 1B/OF. After toying with Brett, Boggs, even Chipper, I landed on ‘13 HR Baker despite having to waste basically all of his $1.61M second version as a pinch hitter. I struggled mightily with the best total use of salary between the two spots, and ultimately his good season fits the best so I went with it.
I tried a lot of options in the 1B/OF spot, needing a good enough 1B season that was half the price. I had a Delahanty combo I liked, but it gave me too many RH hitters in the lineup. Once I decided on LH/SH only, I had to find a way to make Musial work. His $6.5M ‘55 season works well enough at 1B, and I get to use his excellent ‘48 season behind Speaker and Browning atop the order.
Some of the pitching slots filled themselves quickly. The ‘08 Walsh atop the rotation and the 29IP ‘15 in the pen. The ‘01 Pedro’s 118 IP fit nicely just under half of the ‘99 version for 332 total Pedro innings. Maddux has a useful LR season from 2006, so I worked in the best version I could afford in the rotation after all my other moves. I had all RH starters and needed at least some LH innings in the pen, so welcome aboard Arthur Rhodes (fresh in my mind from the 16x16 league, where I knew he had several good seasons). I went with ‘81 Gossage to close with a mediocre 38-inning ‘92 to be a mopup guy. The last pair was the toughest to fit to get enough strong innings out of just over $5M with the required salary ratios, and I tried about 8-10 options. Rafael Betancourt just worked out the best, with his excellent 25-inning ‘09 season to go with the 79 innings from ‘07.
You have to get creative with this theme, and I’ll be curious how many people used some of my same pairs. A handful seemed like no-brainers, and I expect to see a lot of Walsh, Maddux, Pedro and Speaker.
Ballpark: I wanted to favor 1B and 2B for sure, 3B if I could, and HR weren’t a huge concern. Ameriquest met the goals and with the great Elvis in there it just worked out well.
Starters: C Duke Farrell 1891, 1B Stan Musial 1955, 2B Nap Lajoie 1902, SS Elvis Andrus 2017, 3B Frank Baker 1913, OF Pete Browning 1887, Tris Speaker 1912, Stan Musial 1948. Rotation: Ed Walsh 1908, Greg Maddux 1998, Pedro Martinez 1999, Pedro Martinez 2001. Bullpen Keys: Rafael Betancourt 2007-2009, Arthur Rhodes 2002-2005, Rich Gossage 1981, Ed Walsh 1915.
6201 PA .341/.408/.527 361 2B, 100 3B, 156 HR, 322/240 SB/CS $75.56M
1508 IP .204 OAVG, 0.91 WHIP, 1.88 ERA 1349K-267 BB 54HR $64.37M
Outlook: The raw stats for this team aren’t quite as good as those for the 130M team, so maybe I wasted a little more salary than I should have. The PA are definitely higher than I need, as the lineup is virtually locked in every day. But I couldn’t find enough superstars who have sub-300K seasons and had to make some compromises. The pitching money was spent more effectively overall, and a few extra innings seem wise with my park and the cap. I hope I’ve got a competitive team here. It certainly looks good on paper.