I'm at game 135 in a season. I have two players (
Norman Venable +
Norberto Perez) who have been humming along at 100% fatigue the entire season despite having durability of 80 and 83 respectively. A third player,
Steve Hill, has a fatigue rating of 84 yet dipped under 100% quite some time ago. You would expect this to be due to Hill having more appearances in the field and the plate but it doesn't appear to be the case. Perez has 93 more innings more than Hill and Venable has 33 more plate appearances than Hill. Anyone have thoughts on why Hill is fatiguing so much faster than Venable or Perez? If durability was more tied to plate appearances than innings played I would expect Venable to be fatiguing and not at 100. If It was Innings played I would expect Perez to be fatiguing and not at 100. Are there other factors involving fatigue?
| Name |
Durability |
Plate Appearances |
Innings |
| Hill (98%) |
84 |
562 |
1,090 |
| Perez (100%) |
83 |
517 |
1,183 |
| Venable (100%) |
80 |
595 |
1,041 |