I'm interested in people's thoughts for recruiting these guys for high D1, and what position you would play them at.
Player A
100 ath
66 sp
93 reb
100 de
56 sb
25 lp
69 per
66 bh
85 pa
92 sta

Player B
94 ath
77 sp
80 reb
100 de
79 sb
32 lp
100 per
72 bg
65 pa
100 sta

Player C
100 Ath
86 sp
87 reb
100 de
56 sb
33 lp
94 per
86 bg
78 pa
86 sta

Player D
98 ath
86 sp
99 reb
100 de
77 sb
91 lp
44 per
64 bh
50 pa
81 sta

Player E (this one is probably the least weird of the 6---I think I have a pretty good idea about how good he is and what to do with him)
90 ath
74 sp
75 reb
93 de
49 sb
58 lp
71 per
92 bh
92 PA
85 sta

Player F (This one is just ******* weird. Feels like he should be a stud tbh)
74 ath
87 sp
94 reb
89 de
97 sb
64 lp
51+ per
87 bh
43 pa
95 sta

So, do you guys think these are all total studs? and where do you play each of them. Here my answer:
A: Worst player here, but still solid. I'd have him back up the 3/4 on a title team but probably don't want him starting. He's actually listed as a SG.
B: I think you play him at the 4 and have him score 20+ PPG shooting with awesome efficiency. I think this guy is the 2nd best player here.
C: Carbon copy of B but with even better SP/BH/PA. The non-100 stamina and 56 SB makes me sad but I think I still play this dude at the 4 and watch him score 20+ PPG shooting with awesome efficiency, Total stud IMO.
D: Super cool player but I don't think he's the enigma that B or C is. I'd place him at the 4 and watch him go absolutely crazy with that ATH/SP/LP, although the 80 STA makes B and C slightly better IMO.
E: Decent 3. I'd start him on a title team but I'm not jumping to recruit him like B, C, or D.
F: Literally what in the world am I looking at. It looks like the engine just glitched out when making this guy, even moreso than B, C, and D. I think you play him at the 4 and can get 15 PPG with good efficiency out of him even if the PER doesn't get very high?

Player A is a 3 maybe 4? He plays ok post and perimeter defense and rebounds well but that is it. Boring player, limited role.

Player B is a 2-4, super versatile. I wouldn't have any issue having him play all over the place.

Player C is a 2-3. Very solid.

Player D is 2-4. I would be worried about the low BH against press teams but that 91 LP will eat up other teams guards.

Player E is a slow guard. I would play him at the 1-3.

Player F is a post player IMO. He's better defensively inside than out. I wouldn't have a problem playing him at the 3 or 2 (except against press teams) either.