Posted by Guitarguy567 on 11/11/2020 8:23:00 AM (view original):
https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325592112428163072?s=19
Sure. Even if I take the entire thread at face value, it's not evidence of fraud itself. The thread repeats this repeatedly, contradicting itself at the end. All this proves is that there were irregularities that should be explained. That's not evidence of fraud or enough to dismiss the election as fraudulent.
Again, prove this in court. If a random Twitter user could do all of this, surely a gigantic legal team can do more.
If not, then we should all accept the results. I think you'll find that speculation on this level isn't enough to meet the burden of proof.