Quote: Originally Posted By MikeT23 on 1/16/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By tecwrg on 1/16/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By MikeT23 on 1/16/2010
Just guessing but I imagine that only a handful of worlds played a full season under this engine. Seems like they'd want more data before re-tweaking. Give owners time to adjust before adjusting the engine again.

They do have their all-world overview stats that are updated on a weekly basis. That's probably what they're going to base their decisions on rather than the results of individual worlds.

But I agree . . . they need to think this out carefully.




I'm assuming that isn't based upon completed seasons. As you know, things change when fatigue/injury/promotions/etc. set in as the seasons wind down.

I think it's all games for all worlds in a given calendar week. With around 160 worlds, it should be a good distribution of worlds in all different portions of the season. I would think that from a 40,000 foot view, it should be a representative overview of data.

Since the numbers don't seem far off from MLB, I hope they give it a few more months before adjusting again. Constant adjustments without giving the owners a chance to adjust to the engine will become a nightmare.

i don't think the goal should be to mirror whatever MLB's stats are at any given time. MLB's numbers have varied dramatically throughout history, because of natural talent cycles, trends in usage (e.g., short relievers), and rule changes, among other factors. forget rule changes, but we should have naturally-occurring cycles as well when it comes to stats without tweaking the engine all the time (or so drastically).

Gee. Who didn't see this coming?

First, the sky is falling and they have to fix their screwup before pieces of the sky kill someone.

So WIS says they are looking into it.

Now they shouldn't change anything until they study carefully.

You guys have all the constancy of the wind.

Dumbass troll.

The same people are still saying the same message they've been saying since this started.

Thanks for your non-productive commentary on this thread. Well done.

Quote: Originally posted by tecwrg on 1/16/2010.  But still, if you're going to start throwing alias accusations around, have at least the slightest bit of proof before you do it.

That might take 9 or 10 minutes and we all know MikeT wants everyone to know he's a massive jerk and ******* in one, maybe two minutes, tops.

Quote: Originally posted by tecwrg on 1/16/2010Dumbass troll.The same people are still saying the same message they've been saying since this started.Thanks for your non-productive commentary on this thread.  Well done.

Don't worry, I think the troll is still confused by the sample size discussion from another thread.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

As is the troll's need to show up in these threads with his invaluable insight.

You guys kill me.

A troll's objective: Be acknowledged. And, with any luck, start a ******* match with you.