Who would you rather have? Topic

Quote: Originally Posted By jimmystick on 1/21/2010Well, here's the thing with my 2 guys. I already have both of them. My original plan was that in 4 seasons Player A is eligible for FA at which point I can let him walk and take a comp pick and then I'd already have a cheap, comparable replacement.

But Player A has been tearing the cover off the ball for more than a season now. He is currently my backup 3B, SS, 2B, and CF and he spot starts at all 4 positions.

I value Player B's power and speed (I don't have a lot of speed on my current ML roster). Player B is in his 3rd year and is in HiA. I have $16m Adv scouting.

I'm wondering if I should trade B and sign A longterm? I'm not sure I have enough room on my roster for both, though the way A is playing I might have to try to make room somehow
Why would you let Player A go? There are very few SS-qualified players that can actually hit their weight. Arb him at least once, try to sign him long-term after that one season (after deciding whether you're trying to make the playoffs) or trade him during/after his one arb season if you're still 3-5 years away from being a contender.
1/21/2010 6:22 PM
A guy with a good glove and a 99 RHB rating is like gold.
1/21/2010 6:29 PM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
1/21/2010 6:51 PM
Who would you rather have start at 1B?

Kris Alexander

Benny Miranda
1/21/2010 11:46 PM
Quote: Originally posted by jway11 on 1/22/2010Who would you rather have start at 1B?

Kris Alexander

Benny Miranda

I'd take Miranda. Not a big fan of 1B who don't hit for power.
1/22/2010 9:43 AM
◂ Prev 12
Who would you rather have? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.