Walter Johnson '12 (R) 100 17 10-5 0 125.0 2.23 .236 1.10 5.26 1.73 17.53M
Jesse Tannehill '02 (L) 84 (100) 12 6-4 0 75.1 3.46 .311 1.46 3.46 1.67 10.17M
Claude Hendrix '14(R)   #3A 100 14 3-6 0 92.0 4.30 .273 1.46 3.33 3.03 14.59M
Jumbo McGinnis '10 (R) 100 10 6-2 0 70.2 3.18 .251 1.26 3.06 2.67 200K

im using this rotation and after the last game i noticed tannehill t 84%
i have him set at 90 110 and a pull 2
relief not checked for any of my starters.
here's his season line:
1902 Jesse Tannehill (L) 12 90.0 75.3 3.46 .311 1.46 3.5 1.7 26 270.0 1.95 .236 0.99 3.9 1.0

how come he's dropped to 84% ?
am i missing the boat here?
i just changed from a 4 man rotation to this 1/2/3a/3b

Did you just use him? It says he'll be at 100% for next game

yes but why would fatigue to 84% after only 90 pictches this early in th eseason and in a 4 man rotation. clearly he is 50 -60 ip below most of the other stud starters ( johnson.maddux/etc... ) in the league

If you hold your mouse over the fatigue level, it will tell you the reason they are fatigued. Most likely it said, 'tired from recent game activity'.

Quote: Originally Posted By urlglory on 4/22/2010yes but why would fatigue to 84% after only 90 pictches this early in th eseason and in a 4 man rotation. clearly he is 50 -60 ip below most of the other stud starters ( johnson.maddux/etc... ) in the leagu

It's projecting use for the whole season based on games played so far, it'll even out as the season wears on.

It's like real life. After a pitcher throws his first start of the season, he's tired. He's not going to be at 100%, even if he's just thrown 90 pitches.

Quote: Originally Posted By urlglory on 4/22/2010yes but why would fatigue to 84% after only 90 pictches this early in th eseason and in a 4 man rotation. clearly he is 50 -60 ip below most of the other stud starters ( johnson.maddux/etc... ) in the leagu

1. 68 games is not early in the season.

2. It's a 3 man rotation as far as Tannehill is concerned

3. He had 124 fewer real life ip than a 1912 Johnson. After almost half a season he should be 50-60 ip behind.

4. I see your league started 3/31, but Tannehill didn't pitch until 4/8. Did you get him off the wire? If so then his innings are pro-rated.

thanks elbirdo
yes i did have koufax in that slot the first 22 games -
it just seems odd that a guy with that many ip would drop from 100-84 in a game when were not even half way yet. whats he gonna drop to the last 1/3 of the season after games?

What % do you expect to see in that situation?

i didnt think he'd drop below 90 just yet

4/17/2010 at 1:51 am Search for other posts by crazystengel Quote: crazystengel
crazystengel

Hall of Famer

Forum Posts: 3286 Total innings pitched has nothing to do with in-game fatigue. The formula I use to determine my PC is:

IP/G X 15 (others use 16, but I'd rather err on the side of freshness!)

So for 12 Johnson I'd go 7.38 X 15 = 110.7

In which case, I'd give him a PC of 110/115.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

-4468 rating... is it so weird?

Mr. Glory, don't worry. Unless you're planning to pitch him back-to-back games, all you care about is when he'll be back to 100%.

Ya, I don't know why it would matter if he was 1(100) or 99(100). Weird...

Here, I'll turn this thread into something useful.....if you are using a two man rotation, the most fatigued your pitcher can be fatigued and still return to 100% every game is 66(100) [not counting the first few games]. So, if your guy is 70(100) after games, you can increase his PC by 5 for a while.
Can anybody confirm the fatigue level for 3man and 4man rotations?

Mathlete weener.