Player 1 - 3.6 GPA/ D FT (low)

Ath - 34 (Avg)

Spd- 36 (low)

Reb- 36 (Avg)

Def- 64 (High)

SB- 6 (Avg)

LP- 52 (Avg)

Per- 41 (High)

BH- 32 (Avg)

Pa- 31 (Avg)

WE- 26

Sta- 70 (High)

Player 2 - 3.5 GPA/ C+ FT (avg)

Ath- 51 (High)

Spd- 39 (Avg)

Reb- 36 (Avg)

Def- 48 (High)

SB- 21 (Avg)

LP- 40 (Avg)

Per- 34 (Avg)

BH- 21 (Low)

Pa- 33 (Avg)

WE- 29

Sta- 66 (High)

I know these appear often but I can't choose, anyone's opinion will be very appreciated. I run a motion/m2m and I can decide if the recruit with very high athleticism trumps the scoring abilities of the other one. Thanks a lot.

I'm pretty new, and terrible at recruiting, but I'd definitely go for #2, especially if you already have perimeter scorers. I think the extra ATH and SPD gains give him the edge.

I definitely go with player 2, the ath/sp combo blows player 1 out of the water that i tmore than makes up for his lower LP/Per.

player 2 - he'll be a very good defender and a decent inside the 3 point line.

Yeah, that's what i was thinking, my SF probably doesn't need to be the greatest scorer on this team anyway, but the 52 LP of the other fellow is something my team kind of needs...

52 to 40 LP isn't that huge, really.

id take both..

#3