Quote: Originally posted by dalter on 5/12/2010That's a very interesting point that I hadn't thought of before. I don't think that negative nearly trumps the negative that exists with the current system, but definitely something consider.In a 5- or 10-year window, the most recent seasons would be weighted most heavily, and that would take a lot of the bite out of what you're referring to. But they would have to be careful not to make it too easy for long-time coaches, that I agree with.
it is not so much a 4-8-12 system is correct, it might be 2-4-6, might be 3-6-9, might be 4-6-8, but a relatively longer time frame as the division moves up would be what I would prefer - right now, I would guess the last season has a huge impact on who gets hired, I would prefer a system that actually picks the best coach. Since so many people play this game to get to a 'dream' job, it is very important that this part of the game is perceived as 'fair' by as high a % of people as possible.