2 Thoughts on New Engine Topic

I was a beta tester, so I had a little time with the new engine, but its obviously a different version that we are currently running, so that experience is kind of out the door.  Regardless, after 5 games (including 2 exhibitions) in Rupp I have a couple thoughts about the new engine and I was wondering if anyone else sees the same things.

1)  Offensive efficiency seems to be way too high.  I have 2 teams:  http://www.whatifsports.com/hd/TeamProfile/Stats.aspx?tid=4484  and http://www.whatifsports.com/hd/TeamProfile/Stats.aspx?tid=4007   Tenn has 7 new players and W. Chester has 5 new additions.  Neither team has any players that are near as good as previous players on my teams (on the offensive end), yet the offenses are functioning at very high levels.  W. Chester, in particular, is shooting 56% from the floor and 45% from 3-land.  Despite this, they are 1-2, which illustrates that opponent teams are playing at least as well.  Also, last night in my Tenn game vs. Wake, I ran normal tempo vs. his slowdown.  The result -  83-74.  Now, I definitely hated the old 40-36 barnburners in the old engine, but has this taken it too far?  Perhaps tempo isn't affecting the offensive flow enough at all, as my games thus far have involved different tempos from all parties involved, but all scores have remained very consistent.   Small sample size?  Maybe, but perhaps not...

and

2) This is admittedly minor, but my Tenn team is the defending champs and while we had to replace 7 guys in recruiting (and are not good this year), shouldn't we have at least started the year ranked somewhere in the top 25?  Shouldn't we have been given the opportunity to earn our way out of the top 25 with losses (which will no doubt come)?  Moreover, after 3 games, we are 3-0 (all W's over Big 6 teams) and still not in the top 25 (we are finally receiving votes).  That seems messed up to me.  I realize the new rankings are based more on ratings and performance (rather than past performance), but still.... this seems a bit of an oversight; this would not happen in real life.

6/30/2010 9:51 AM
As to number one. . each team had about 64 possessions.  That isn't that bad.  Both teams shot over 52% from the field and got and hit allot of free throws.  Their EFG's were respectively 63% and 55%.    It doesn't look like a ton too many possessions so much as really good use of the possessions there were. The two teams got respectively 1.287 and 1.156 points per possession.

As to number two. .you are never going to 100% simulate a human voting system with a machine with a set of rules.



6/30/2010 12:23 PM (edited)
2 Thoughts on New Engine Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.