Splits vs. Contact/Power Topic

Would you rather have an 80/80 (contact/power) 50-50 split guy or a 50-50 C/P and 80-80 split guy?

It seems, theoretically, they should be similar as the C/P numbers and splits would cancel each other out, but I doubt that's the case.  Advice/thoughts?
7/23/2010 9:55 PM
The former will usually generate more RC, the latter will have a higher AVG.
7/23/2010 10:12 PM
Given equal batting eyes, I'd take the 80/80 contact/power guy. Higher OPS than the 80/80 split guy.
7/24/2010 5:56 AM
No question I'd take the contact power. 50/50/80/80 isn't anything special. 


7/24/2010 4:17 PM
These aren't perfect examples but its clear who is the better player


[URL=http://www.whatifsports.com/hbd/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=2380212]Esteban Camacho[/URL] 

[URL=http://www.whatifsports.com/hbd/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=1984340]T.J. Cosby[/URL]
7/24/2010 4:20 PM
Posted by texashick on 7/24/2010 4:20:00 PM (view original):
These aren't perfect examples but its clear who is the better player


[URL=http://www.whatifsports.com/hbd/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=2380212]Esteban Camacho[/URL] 

[URL=http://www.whatifsports.com/hbd/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=1984340]T.J. Cosby[/URL]
Their batter's eye is too far apart to make a valid comparison. Thirty points is a pretty big difference.
7/24/2010 4:42 PM
I think that most would agree the con/pwr guy will generate more total offense, only reason to prefer the other guy - all else being equal - would be if you have a specific need for a table setter.
7/24/2010 7:41 PM
Too many variables to consider...  Speed is just one of the things that make a difference.
7/26/2010 12:13 AM
Splits vs. Contact/Power Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.