Should I be starting James Bradley or Jordan Lewis at SF?  Lewis was very good for me last year and his BH and P mean he won't turn it over.  He also is a useful rebounder.  Bradley is a MUCH better defender and a solid perimeter shooter for a D3 SF.  His IQs are still B-, though.  So far I'm using Lewis, but I'm starting to wonder if it's the wrong decision.

In a vacuum, for a zone/triangle team, I would say Lewis for the rebounding.  Looking at the rest of your team, I see that you need Lewis to play backup PF.  The best way to accomplish that (IMHO) is if he is not also the starting SF.  If you feel like you can live with a less than optimal PF backup at times then continue to start Lewis.

If you are the type who likes to switch between the 2-3 and the 3-2, I would go with Bradley because he is the stronger defender.  If you have a (relatively) weaker defender at SF you are actually weakening the 3 part of the zone (be it 2-3 or 3-2) and negating some of the benefit of the particular set.

Bradley is a better athlete, a little faster, plays better "D" and has a better per. game. When you ad the fact that you need Lewis to play some PF it becomes a pretty easy decision...start Bradley. Just my 2 cents...