I think this is a great ?, I really don't know the answer, there are times I think IQ is worth alot, other times when I think it isn't worth all that much,
there is a school of thought that gill and I subscribe to he as a programmer, me as an ex-programmer, how would you code it, most stuff appears to be done in a linear fashion. If an F diminishes a player say by 50%, and a A gets him full tilt, the break even point for a 60 vs a 50 avg skilled player might be around B- or C+ - lots of speculation involved - don't know if my logic makes any sense? (i.e. the F makes the 60 skills into 30 skills, a C would make them 45 skills, and a B would make them 52.5, and an A full up at 60 skills.
Also. one would have to take into account a higher value placed on core skills, say like BH/PA in a PG for example if this exercise were done in real fake HD, since noone is exactly 60 or 50 at everything, at least not very often?
All spitballin on my part, but a great - fun ? - thanks