33 Openings in 6 Public Worlds. Topic

I think the primary issue is to make it obvious to seasoned owners that don't read the forums which private worlds have openings.  The reported fix in the works should help to correct that.
11/6/2010 11:23 PM
Quote post by hartjh14 on 11/6/2010 9:31:00 PM:
I was in the league for several years, including one where admin finally admitted that there were teams that appeared to be ran by the same people, but wouldn't say who.  I left the league out of frustration for nobody wanting to fix anything and being blamed for the problems.  I came back this season when it was public hoping they figured out that I wasn't the problem.  They convinced Admin I was the reason they couldn't fill and had me removed, then proceeded to not fill and go back to being public.  Again, I'm hoping they figure out I'm not the problem and actually consider plans to fix things.  If that tweaks them along the way, so be it.

WOW.
I would think WIS has to know this can do nothing but spell doom for a world. One would think they would have everything to gain by removing at least one of the aliases, if not both.
11/6/2010 11:25 PM
Posted by plague on 11/6/2010 10:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dyoungquist on 11/6/2010 5:15:00 PM (view original):
Little consolation to those who are still waiting for their world to fill after 2+ weeks.
I don't think any of the 4 current public worlds have been public for 2 plus weeks, 3 of the 4 public worlds just recently rolled over. I am in 3 worlds that just recently rolled over and filled quickly.  Private worlds are responsible for filling up their own world, that is why they stay private as they want to pick and choose who they let into their world, they can always choose to go public and fill quickly as the public worlds have been filling at a reasonable rate.
For the record....Eckersley rolled on 10/24 (2 weeks ago),  Greenburg on 11/3, Vin Scully on 11/1, and John Kruk we will leave to others to discuss.  Eckersley may fill soon cause for the first time since rolling over they now have the fewest openings of any public world.  Some worlds with only 1-3-5 openings have filed in a couple days but the ones with 6-8-10 openings have been taking weeks to fill recently.
11/6/2010 11:54 PM
Posted by dyoungquist on 11/6/2010 11:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by plague on 11/6/2010 10:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dyoungquist on 11/6/2010 5:15:00 PM (view original):
Little consolation to those who are still waiting for their world to fill after 2+ weeks.
I don't think any of the 4 current public worlds have been public for 2 plus weeks, 3 of the 4 public worlds just recently rolled over. I am in 3 worlds that just recently rolled over and filled quickly.  Private worlds are responsible for filling up their own world, that is why they stay private as they want to pick and choose who they let into their world, they can always choose to go public and fill quickly as the public worlds have been filling at a reasonable rate.
For the record....Eckersley rolled on 10/24 (2 weeks ago),  Greenburg on 11/3, Vin Scully on 11/1, and John Kruk we will leave to others to discuss.  Eckersley may fill soon cause for the first time since rolling over they now have the fewest openings of any public world.  Some worlds with only 1-3-5 openings have filed in a couple days but the ones with 6-8-10 openings have been taking weeks to fill recently.
Are you counting the time the world is private? Has Eckersley been public since 10/24? I don't recall them being on the public list a week ago, you are in Eckersley so I won't doubt your word... Once these worlds go public probably 95%  of them fill within a week. In my opinion that is a reasonable amount of time to be public and fill the world. There is exceptions, one of my worlds took over a month to fill when it was public, but that was about 7 seasons ago and it has filled nicely ever since.
11/6/2010 11:59 PM
A world with 6-8-10 openings needs to look in a mirror.
11/7/2010 9:30 AM
Eckersley has been a public world for the last 5 seasons I have been in it.  It has been on the public list since we rolled over on 10/24.  We needed 6 owners at that time and still need 3 as of now.  Eckersley has gotten lost in crowd as several worlds with fewer openings have filled in that 2 week time.  Eckersley is not a 'tard public world either.  No bad reputation preceeding it.  I have enjoy being in at as much as I have enjoyed the 2 private worlds I am in.

When WIS admin adds private worlds to the list so we can see the number of openings there I think many will be surprised by the total number of openings at any given time.  I know some have a love affair with virgin (new) worlds but adding more at this time is doing more harm than good in my opinion.
11/7/2010 9:38 AM
Posted by MikeT23 on 11/7/2010 9:30:00 AM (view original):
A world with 6-8-10 openings needs to look in a mirror.
This.  I suppose there could be one instance of it for some odd reason, but if this happens more than once or in consecutive seasons, there's a problem.
11/7/2010 9:40 AM
Posted by lesliechow on 11/9/2010 3:38:00 PM (view original):
It's way past time to put the chop to several worlds that are not filling up fast enough.  John Kruk needs to be KO'd.
Your infinite experience has all the answers.. replying to every post on the board....
11/10/2010 2:16 PM
You are blocking the author of this post, lesliechow.
11/10/2010 2:33 PM
◂ Prev 1...7|8|9
33 Openings in 6 Public Worlds. Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.