offense to help low post game? Topic

what offense best utilizes the lost post players?

A user asked me this ?, unfortunately for him, my answer was they are all the same.  I thought others could do better for that coach, so I reposted the ? here.
1/12/2011 11:36 AM
I would think all things equal, triangle could be the best.
     
1/12/2011 11:41 AM
In theory, triangle. In the actual game, I would have to say it's pretty equal. I don't see dramatically different fg% among my bigs in triangle or motion (I don't have flex or fb teams), as long distro don't becomes crazy. 
1/12/2011 11:51 AM
i agree OR, its pretty much a wash. i've pondered the question for a long time and haven't come up with much of anything. i do think if you gave me 1 spectacular big, and a bunch of shmucks, i would feel safe picking triangle as being the most productive for the awesome guy. but if you give me a couple good bigs, i really haven't been able to find any one offense as better than any other.

if somebody is trying to make a strategy out of taking a bunch of quality bigs and pounding it inside, the only offense i might feel has an edge over the others would be fb. it seems to me you get marginally less out of each successive big, but when i played fb, it sort of seemed like you didn't run into this problem, or at least it was less noticeable. but i really don't know. its just an inkling.
1/12/2011 12:02 PM
does anyone know when the game was originally written?  I am guessing around the year 2000?

anyhow, motion in the 'old' days was much more about pass and screen away, with lots of low post exchanges, a 3 out 2 in set - I am talking motion for 10-12 years ago now - these days motion is much more a 4-1 set, with the words dribble drive attached to it.

I think of triangle in the year 2000 as the chicago bulls offense,  as an offense that utilizing ball pick and rolls from the wings (Jordan, pippen, kukoc), and lots of high post play, not low post.

I think of flex as wings cutting from weak side to ball side, aided by a back pick, a little low post, but lots of ath / sp.

FB seems to need ath / sp / stam in this game billy, not sure I would recommend FB to a novice recruiting LP players in d3, matter of fact near the opposite.

My straw man recommendation for LP players in HD is motion?  I think?
1/12/2011 12:18 PM

it seems when I up the distro of a C in triangle I see, as expected, more shot attempts, more FT attempts and more turnovers.  So if the question was which offense can I increase the distro for my lowpost guy and see the most point production, I'd probably go with triangle.

in motion I generally don't see the same rate of increase in shots but rather an increase in assists.

1/12/2011 1:04 PM
Posted by oldresorter on 1/12/2011 12:18:00 PM (view original):
does anyone know when the game was originally written?  I am guessing around the year 2000?

anyhow, motion in the 'old' days was much more about pass and screen away, with lots of low post exchanges, a 3 out 2 in set - I am talking motion for 10-12 years ago now - these days motion is much more a 4-1 set, with the words dribble drive attached to it.

I think of triangle in the year 2000 as the chicago bulls offense,  as an offense that utilizing ball pick and rolls from the wings (Jordan, pippen, kukoc), and lots of high post play, not low post.

I think of flex as wings cutting from weak side to ball side, aided by a back pick, a little low post, but lots of ath / sp.

FB seems to need ath / sp / stam in this game billy, not sure I would recommend FB to a novice recruiting LP players in d3, matter of fact near the opposite.

My straw man recommendation for LP players in HD is motion?  I think?
OR, i didn't realize you were talking about a new coach. to a new coach, i would definitely not recommend FB.

i think motion would probably be my second to last recommendation to a new coach looking to heavily utilize the low post (after fb). i think with a couple quality bigs on the floor together, its as good as any, but new coaches don't usually have all quality players on the team. and your ability to push 1 quality big far is probably lowest in the motion offense, of the 3 standard offenses.
1/12/2011 1:20 PM
As far as utilizing the big men in the offense I think motion and triangle seem fairly equivalent.  For the triangle I'd value LP a bit more than in the motion and in the motion I'd look for a better passing big, but he'll be productive in either set...  Traditional bigs will be somewhat less productive in the flex, which at least in this game seems to emphasize jump shooters (typically true in RL, but I'd imagine a RL coach who ran a flex offense would be able to accommodate a dominant post player.  Any real life program that recruits Ralph Sampson, regardless of what kind of offense they typically run, is going to find a way to score in the post.  Unfortunately some of that flexibility doesn't fully translate into this game...)
1/12/2011 2:29 PM
Quote post by oldresorter on 1/12/2011 12:18:00 PM:does anyone know when the game was originally written?  I am guessing around the year 2000?

anyhow, motion in the 'old' days was much more about pass and screen away, with lots of low post exchanges, a 3 out 2 in set - I am talking motion for 10-12 years ago now - these days motion is much more a 4-1 set, with the words dribble drive attached to it.


While that's true in a lot of systems, it's not so across the board.  Take a look at my alma mater (Kansas).  Self's high-low motion features extensive screens when he uses it, and their standard offensive set most of the time involves very heavy use of ball screens, pick-and-roll and pick-and-pop.  If they're playing against a team who uses quick guards in a Man defense but are weak inside, they go to 4-1.

1/12/2011 6:11 PM

I think offense has greatly evolved over the past years but I'd go back a bit further (maybe twenty years) to find the old-traditional sets.

Both the triangle and the motion offenses have been around for what seems like forever.  The triangle at least predates Tex Winter over 60 years ago and the basic modern motion is created to Hank Iba. 

The triangle has changed a bit in that there seems to be more of an emphasis on pass to the high post ala the Lakers and Pau Gasol.  But the basic spacing is still the same concepts used decades ago.

While the basic principles of the motion haven't really changed, pass the ball;  1) go to the hoop, 2) screen off ball  3) screen for the ballhandler  4) cut and replace to position,  there are a lot more 4-1 sets with the penetration dribble drive and kick out possibly being the desired results rather than the pick and roll or give and go of yesterday.  Probably much of that can be traced to the three point line and coaches learning how to utilize it.    Even when a team does play 2 posts, it's often not the traditional high post/low post but one player assuming more of a wide post off the blocks.
 

1/12/2011 6:45 PM
I thought OR was talking about how the offenses worked when the game first came out...  As in, how they worked in the game...  Nothing to do with RL offenses...
1/12/2011 10:48 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/12/2011 10:48:00 PM (view original):
I thought OR was talking about how the offenses worked when the game first came out...  As in, how they worked in the game...  Nothing to do with RL offenses...
yes and no, I was linking the real game of basketball in the late 90's  to the current HD game, since I would guess that is how tarek would have designed it.  I see no evidence that the game has changed with the times.  Also, I would guess, the initial conception / design had to occur quite some time prior to the formal release.

I\n HD still think flex is best for an outside game, motion best for inside, and triangle is the most balanced, but while doing this thread an idea hit me on this thread how to verify it, might do a little project to see if I can tell a difference.  Funny, some of my best strategy has come as result of trying to answer other coaches ?'s.

Anyhow, to my friend asking the question about trying to put together a big team full of LP, not one LP dominant player, but several, I think it is clear there is no real concensus on how to achieve that, which was my original answer to you.  Heck, maybe you can figure it out and email me the answer - good luck.
1/13/2011 7:37 AM
Posted by Iguana1 on 1/12/2011 6:45:00 PM (view original):

I think offense has greatly evolved over the past years but I'd go back a bit further (maybe twenty years) to find the old-traditional sets.

Both the triangle and the motion offenses have been around for what seems like forever.  The triangle at least predates Tex Winter over 60 years ago and the basic modern motion is created to Hank Iba. 

The triangle has changed a bit in that there seems to be more of an emphasis on pass to the high post ala the Lakers and Pau Gasol.  But the basic spacing is still the same concepts used decades ago.

While the basic principles of the motion haven't really changed, pass the ball;  1) go to the hoop, 2) screen off ball  3) screen for the ballhandler  4) cut and replace to position,  there are a lot more 4-1 sets with the penetration dribble drive and kick out possibly being the desired results rather than the pick and roll or give and go of yesterday.  Probably much of that can be traced to the three point line and coaches learning how to utilize it.    Even when a team does play 2 posts, it's often not the traditional high post/low post but one player assuming more of a wide post off the blocks.
 

yea - it is really something how it evolved from the pass and screen away - my first tape of motion was hurley / laettner at duke.  I remember the first time I taught 'motion' to a group of 8th graders, ran thru it for a couple of minutes, they got it OK, all of a sudden my best kid, a wing, stops with the ball in his hands and asks a great ?, 'coach, when do we stop doing all this passing and screening, so I can dribble it up to the hoop and score?  At the time, I thought it was a pretty valid ?.

I love in that sense how the motion has evolved into emphasizing more the breaking down of the middle in more dribble drive and then some sort of pullup, shovel pass, or kickout pass.  Another great pass for an open 3 is straight back to the original side to the screener or original passer, as the dribble drive creates so much flow toward the middle and weak side.

Anyhow, like the real game alot Iguana, always nice to read your comments, I know you know your stuff, appreciate it!
1/13/2011 7:45 AM
Posted by oldresorter on 1/13/2011 7:37:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/12/2011 10:48:00 PM (view original):
I thought OR was talking about how the offenses worked when the game first came out...  As in, how they worked in the game...  Nothing to do with RL offenses...
yes and no, I was linking the real game of basketball in the late 90's  to the current HD game, since I would guess that is how tarek would have designed it.  I see no evidence that the game has changed with the times.  Also, I would guess, the initial conception / design had to occur quite some time prior to the formal release.

I\n HD still think flex is best for an outside game, motion best for inside, and triangle is the most balanced, but while doing this thread an idea hit me on this thread how to verify it, might do a little project to see if I can tell a difference.  Funny, some of my best strategy has come as result of trying to answer other coaches ?'s.

Anyhow, to my friend asking the question about trying to put together a big team full of LP, not one LP dominant player, but several, I think it is clear there is no real concensus on how to achieve that, which was my original answer to you.  Heck, maybe you can figure it out and email me the answer - good luck.
Personally I doubt the code for HD is complex/nuanced enough to differentiate between different flavors of motion, flex and triangle.  (And that is not intended as criticism.)
1/13/2011 9:19 AM
offense to help low post game? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.