Posted by jbrewman1 on 3/9/2011 5:28:00 PM (view original):
This has almost become funny to me. Do the math. If I offer a schollie and he declines i've spent what ? 110 dollars. If I call and i'm a backup option then my mouth gets all wet and i'm offering HV's and CV's and evals. 

like this one. he acknowledges that for 10 dollars you can find if someone is a backup option, or you could spent 110 dollars. but what does the rest of it mean? it doesn't make a damn bit of sense. he is recognizing his way takes an extra 100 dollars, and then somehow saying that makes his way better. its like he is tripping and has a 10 second memory and cannot put together 2 thoughts in which the second is based on the first...

Posted by turtis21 on 3/10/2011 5:00:00 PM (view original):
Dac, I was more responding to the whole forum in general, sorry for the confusion.

and Billyg, have you really never met someone in real life who acted like that? completely believeing something he has brainwashed himself into?

yeah but at least it usually somewhat makes sense. in the sense that you can sort of see what misguided ideal(s) the whole house of cards rests on. i've seen that plenty of times. but it seems like this guy understands all the mechanics but just has some giant leap of ridiculousness to the conclusion.

Posted by coach_billyg on 3/10/2011 5:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jbrewman1 on 3/9/2011 5:28:00 PM (view original):
This has almost become funny to me. Do the math. If I offer a schollie and he declines i've spent what ? 110 dollars. If I call and i'm a backup option then my mouth gets all wet and i'm offering HV's and CV's and evals. 

like this one. he acknowledges that for 10 dollars you can find if someone is a backup option, or you could spent 110 dollars. but what does the rest of it mean? it doesn't make a damn bit of sense. he is recognizing his way takes an extra 100 dollars, and then somehow saying that makes his way better. its like he is tripping and has a 10 second memory and cannot put together 2 thoughts in which the second is based on the first...

he also seems to imply that once identified players can be pulled down with HVs and CVs...please do not listen to him folks.

im not sure that made much sense... what i am saying is, a lot of people believe some crazy ****. like 1+1 is 5. then they will say, 1+1 + 1 + 1 is 10. and you go well, i can see where he is coming from, even though hes wrong. but this case its like, 1+1 is 2. 2+2 is 4. 1+1+1+1 is negative q. what??

/yea, but where I live I have an uncle who is older like mid sixties, and he understands how games work, and plays alot of games, but he always creates wierd strategies out of no where and he can't coherently explain his logic, like, he just made it up and his mind tricks itself into believing that. jbrew reminds me of that uncle.

ok maybe i am being unfair. i guess its the stuff in the first 5-7 pages that isn't him explaining his strategy, where it seems very trollish, that makes me feel like its all trolling. but, i guess i really don't know. i guess it doesn't matter. if i misjudged you jbrewman, sorry.