Here is the sRPI (shqipta ratings points index) for season 39: 

RANK	TEAM	SRP
1	Oregon	277.28
2	Miami (FL)	272.03
3	Georgia Tech	271.84
4	Arizona	270.55
5	Syracuse	268.65
6	Florida St.	266.5
7	Colorado	265.83
8	Maryland	265.26
9	Stanford	264.92
10	UCLA	263.99
11	Oklahoma	263.2
12	Texas	261.51
13	Boston College	260.75
14	UNC	260.69
15	Connecticut	259.26
16	Iowa	257.26
17	USC	255.66
18	Illinois	255.34
19	Northwestern	254.46
20	Kansas	254.14
21	Michigan St.	253.72
22	Michigan	252.59
23	Arizona St.	250.8
24	Indiana	250.71
25	Virginia	250.59
26	Wake Forest	250.29
27	Mississippi	250.09
28	N. Carolina St.	249.29
29	Clemson	247.99
30	Fresno St.	247.95
31	Minnesota	247.55
32	SE Missouri St.	246.98
33	St. Johns	246.42
34	Southeastern Louisiana	246.39
35	Florida	245.64
36	Georgetown	245.38
37	Colorado St.	243.82
38	Nebraska	242.84
39	BYU	242.13
40	Washington	242.12
41	Utah	241.93
42	Kentucky	241.17
43	Louisville	240.79
44	Providence	240.27
45	Valparaiso	239.62
46	Duke	239.55
47	Kent St.	239.13
48	Oklahoma St.	239.12
49	Oregon St.	239.11
50	Texas Tech	238.91
51	Jacksonville St.	238.77
52	Troy	238.65
53	Alabama	237.72
54	Wyoming	237.68
55	Texas A&M	236.94
56	Vanderbilt	236.77
57	Wisconsin	236.73
58	Georgia	236.73
59	Columbia	236.69
60	Auburn	236.33
61	Memphis	234.98
62	Cal	234.96
63	Arkansas	234.82
64	SMU	234.78
65	Purdue	234.14
66	Bucknell	234.03
67	Pacific	233.8
68	Texas Southern	233.41
69	Baylor	233.23
70	Montana St.	232.95
71	Chicago St.	232.28
72	San Jose St.	232.01
73	Rider	231.86
74	Prairie View A&M	231.43
75	Seton Hall	231.35
76	New Mexico St.	230.89
77	Tennessee	230.86
78	Pepperdine	230.79
79	UNLV	230.69
80	Kansas St.	230.67
81	Niagara	230.63
82	S. Carolina St.	230.34
83	Arkansas St.	230.2
84	Illinois-Chicago	229.31
85	Texas Christian	229.27
86	Duquesne	229.01
87	W. Michigan	228.88
88	Old Dominion	228.56
89	Alcorn St.	228.54
90	UTEP	228.31
91	Iowa St.	228.14
92	San Diego St.	228.07
93	Mississippi Valley St.	228.06
94	Colgate	227.9
95	Cincinnati	227.81
96	Wagner	227.39
97	Davidson	226.62
98	Central Florida	226.25
99	Murray St.	226.2
100	Liberty	225.95
101	Virginia Tech	225.91
102	Mississippi St.	225.61
103	Ohio St.	225.38
104	Furman	225.37
105	S. Mississippi	225.27
106	Indiana St.	225.13
107	Weber St.	224.39
108	High Point	224.35
109	Campbell	224.21
110	Rice	224.18
111	New Mexico	224.07
112	Maryland, E. Shore	223.82
113	Austin Peay	223.45
114	S. Carolina	223.42
115	Loyola (MD)	223.24
116	New Orleans	222.91
117	Charleston So.	222.67
118	Penn St.	221.91
119	Miami (OH)	221.39
120	Idaho St.	221.34
121	Ball St.	221.27
122	Georgia St.	221.11
123	Jacksonville	220.88
124	Oakland	220.62
125	Monmouth	220.57
126	Dartmouth	220.55
127	Delaware St.	220.38
128	E. Kentucky	220.22
129	San Diego	219.97
130	Rhode Island	219.61
131	Cleveland St.	219.55
132	Creighton	219.53
133	Manhattan	219.39
134	Hawaii	218.94
135	Tennessee St.	218.48
136	W. Kentucky	218.45
137	Pittsburgh	218.31
138	St. Francis of NY	218.03
139	IPFW	218.01
140	UNC, Wilmington	217.99
141	California, Irvine	217.91
142	Birmingham-Southern	217.83
143	Villanova	217.64
144	Loyola Chicago	217.62
145	Missouri St.	217.57
146	Washington St.	217.55
147	Coppin St.	217.39
148	Tennessee Tech.	217.36
149	UMBC	217.32
150	Gonzaga	217.15
151	Hartford	217.05
152	Temple	216.89
153	Detroit	216.23
154	Arkansas, Pine Bluff	216.16
155	Portland St.	216.02
156	N. Texas	215.92
157	Gardner-Webb	215.6
158	S. Utah	215.44
159	Morgan St.	215.42
160	Northwestern St.	215.34
161	CSU, Northridge	215.21
162	St. Bonaventure	215.12
163	Xavier	214.83
164	Towson	214.74
165	E. Michigan	214.63
166	Tennessee, Chattanooga	214.48
167	C. Michigan	214.22
168	New Hampshire	214.19
169	Loyola Marymount	214.13
170	Louisiana St.	213.97
171	Louisiana Tech	213.79
172	La Salle	213.77
173	VCU	213.25
174	Morehead St.	213.06
175	Cornell	213.02
176	Samford	212.98
177	Boston U.	212.93
178	Holy Cross	212.91
179	Tulsa	212.9
180	E. Carolina	212.9
181	N. Arizona	212.57
182	The Citadel	212.55
183	W. Virginia	212.54
184	American U.	212.35
185	Southern	212.19
186	Wofford	212.16
187	Portland	212.12
188	Centenary	211.95
189	UMass	211.82
190	Texas A&M, CC	211.78
191	Northeastern	211.73
192	Sam Houston St.	211.73
193	George Washington	211.72
194	Youngstown St.	211.62
195	Bowling Green	211.49
196	Charleston	211.39
197	S. Florida	211.37
198	George Mason	211.13
199	Iona	211.09
200	CSU, Fullerton	210.98
201	Hofstra	210.95
202	Stephen F. Austin	210.86
203	Middle Tenn. St.	210.85
204	VMI	210.69
205	Butler	210.34
206	E. Tennessee St.	210.26
207	Tulane	210.2
208	Utah St.	210.18
209	Lafayette	209.96
210	Sacramento St.	209.88
211	Coastal Carolina	209.51
212	Appalachian St.	209.43
213	C. Connecticut St.	209.41
214	E. Illinois	209.31
215	Belmont	209.28
216	Lehigh	209.21
217	Georgia Southern	209.18
218	Hampton	209.09
219	Robert Morris	208.93
220	Marshall	208.91
221	Wisconsin, Green Bay	208.85
222	Alabama A&M	208.81
223	James Madison	208.39
224	Denver	208.39
225	Morris Brown	208.23
226	Binghamton	208.21
227	Fordham	208.19
228	Winthrop	208.09
229	St. Francis	207.75
230	Wichita St.	207.5
231	Stetson	207.14
232	UNC, Asheville	207.04
233	Long Beach St.	207
234	Louisiana, Monroe	206.87
235	Long Island	206.84
236	Lipscomb	206.62
237	William and Mary	206.61
238	Marist	206.61
239	Nevada	206.57
240	Elon	206.54
241	Notre Dame	206.25
242	W. Carolina	206.25
243	McNeese St.	206.21
244	California, Riverside	206.17
245	Richmond	206.1
246	N. Illinois	205.96
247	TX State-San Marcos	205.88
248	Florida Atlantic	205.64
249	Navy	205.63
250	Ohio	205.56
251	UNC, Greensboro	205.52
252	Charlotte	205.35
253	Bethune-Cookman	205.35
254	Sacred Heart	205.28
255	Fairleigh Dickinson	205.23
256	Yale	205.18
257	E. Washington	205.08
258	Pennsylvania	205.03
259	Rutgers	204.86
260	UAB	204.73
261	Florida Int.	204.63
262	N. Iowa	204.42
263	Fairfield	204.38
264	Texas-Arlington	204.32
265	N. Carolina A&T	204.3
266	Wright St.	204.21
267	Illinois St.	204.14
268	Jackson St.	204.1
269	Albany	204.07
270	DePaul	204.04
271	IUPUI	204.03
272	Brown	203.95
273	St. Joseph's (PA)	203.95
274	Florida A&M	203.94
275	California, Santa Barbara	203.26
276	Missouri-KC	203.14
277	Cal. Poly SLO	203.06
278	Drake	203.05
279	Lamar	202.95
280	Delaware	202.8
281	Alabama St.	202.8
282	Quinnipiac	202.64
283	Evansville	202.6
284	Norfolk St.	202.41
285	Arkansas, Little Rock	202.34
286	Harvard	201.88
287	Vermont	201.83
288	Tennessee, Martin	201.81
289	Princeton	201.6
290	Radford	201.5
291	Santa Clara	201.42
292	Canisius	201.36
293	Buffalo	201.28
294	Nicholls St.	201.2
295	Stony Brook	200.97
296	W. Illinois	200.8
297	Texas, San Antonio	200.76
298	Wisconsin, Milwaukee	200.56
299	Grambling St.	200.4
300	Missouri	200.4
301	Mt. St. Mary's	200.16
302	Boise St.	199.93
303	Siena	199.9
304	Marquette	199.53
305	San Francisco	199.48
306	Maine	199.12
307	Idaho	198.92
308	Bradley	198.84
309	UL-Lafayette	198.7
310	Akron	198.61
311	Oral Roberts	198.56
312	Dayton	198.26
313	Toledo	198.16
314	St. Peters	197.5
315	S. Alabama	196.89
316	Air Force	196.8
317	Drexel	195.46
318	Houston	194.81
319	Howard	194.66
320	Montana	194.06
321	Mercer	192.47
322	S. Illinois	191.06
323	St. Louis	182.13
324	Army	178.07

Thanks for compiling it, shqipta.  Interesting that no Big Ten teams made the top 15.  I'll be interested to see if that holds true this season. You obviously spend some time and have fun with the game. Makes the MWC a fun conference to be in, I'll bet.

Thanks Shqipta.  I started a blog on CUSA because of your ratings.  Please take a look at when you can!

http://hdphelancusa.blogspot.com/

Excellent stuff, shqipta. Very solid. Can you give us some general explanation of how your system works, without giving away your secret formula? Also, are the total ratings from last year available anywhere? I'd like to see how much I underachieved last year...

noleaniml-I first got the idea from bhazelwood's gdreports in Gridiron Dynasty. But then seble posted a thread about how he was going to create a way for each coach to create their own custom formula, by weighting each attribute so that coaches that prefered ATH and DEF and disregarded DUR, could get a Overall Rating for a player that more closely related to the player's actual abilities than the Total Rating that we are given now. I bumped the thread in the main forum, and hyperlinked to it here so you can see what I'm talking about:

http://www.whatifsports.com/forums/Posts.aspx?ForumID=30&TopicID=433659&ThreadID=9335303#l_9335303

I've been using that type of system for a few years now, and as I was doing the MWC previews, I put together a spreadsheet so that I could figure out the Adjusted Overall Ratings, I'd been using on my own players, for every MWC player on every team. Then I realized that I could use the exact same spreadsheet (12 spaces for players fits nicely with 12 team conferences) and just copy and paste in the "Team Ratings" stuff for each team and the spreadsheet then gives me a weighted overall score. I use three different forumlas, get three different weighted scores, add the three together, include small formula that adjusts for teams that don't have 12 players (as in pre-recruiting), and come up with the SRP for each team. The conference teams are all added, and then divided by 12 to give the conference score. Now that I've got the fields and formula's set up, it doesn't take that long to come up with the SRPI. 

It doesn't take into account IQs or FT grade. Also if a team has walkons it can really hurt their score because they are calculated along with everyone else, which when I have walkons, I never play them a single minute, and as long as I have 10 players it doesn't really matter.  

Basically the point is to give every team the next step past the overall "Team Rating" that you can get, by adjusting that overall "Team Rating" to more accurately reflect the talent level of your team. Does that mean you'll always win teams rated higher than you? No. But like RPI it gives you a better idea of where you stand than simply comparing your unadjusted Team Rating to your conference mates.

Unfortunately I don't have anything beyond the MWC for previous seasons.
 
Hope that helps.

Yeah, that was a great explanation. Specifically, I was wondering about you handled walk-ons and you addressed it directly. Thanks for your work... it definitely gives us one more thing to obsess about.

How are you pulling the data from the site? I might mess around with doing something similar, however, I have no idea how to mine the data.

Here are the results v. sRPI predicted results for game one in the MWC. As you can see the sRPI was 11-1 in predicting the winner, although Washington St. nearly upset Utah. The only wrong prediction was DePaul (coached by coolman97865) winning over Denver (sim ai coached), which with the small difference in sRPI and the fact that sim coaches tend to misuse their talent more than human coaches, is not surprising.  I'm not so good at math, but that looks like about 92% right. Not bad for day one. 

Team	Score	SRPI
Houston	52	195
TCU	86	229
Air Force	60	197
Jacksonville St	92	239
Denver	57	208
DePaul	71	204
Tenn.Tech	66	217
TSU	85	233
UNLV	75	231
Idaho	63	199
Utah	55	242
Wash.St.	54	218
N.Texas	74	216
Southern	64	213
Portland St.	52	216
New Mexico	59	224
BYU	79	242
American U.	67	213
Wyoming	59	238
Florida	67	246
CSU	87	244
Miss St.	81	226
SDSU	65	228
San Fransisco	55	199

Great stuff shqipta, nice to see the Buffs that high on the list. I thought Oregon, Miami, and Arizona looked like legit title contenders just glancing at the rosters in the preaseason. Thanks for your work

The sRPI is 21-3 after two games in the MWC. Here are game 2 results. 

Team	Score	sRPI
Wyoming	88	237
Montana St.	78	233
Manhattan	83	219
Air Force	62	197
TSU	77	233
Stetson	72	207
New Mexico	74	224
Central Florida	64	226
BYU	71	242
Alcorn St.	58	229
N.Texas	59	216
Birmingham-Southern	86	219
Alabama	68	238
CSU	67	242
UCLA	88	264
Denver	63	208
Utah	67	242
Oregon St.	66	239
Siena	39	200
SDSU	71	228
TCU	49	229
Virginia	59	251
UNLV	87	231
Villanova	80	218

32-4 after three games, that's 89% right. The four losses were (1) a Human coached Team over came a 4 sRPI difference against a Sim Team at home; (2) Alabama over came a 4 sRPI difference to eke out a 1 point win; (3) New Mexico overcame a 2 sRPI difference to beat Central Florida; and  (4) TCU, with home-court advantage, overcame a 2 sRPI difference to win by 4.  I'd say all things considered, at least comparing MWC teams, the sRPI has done pretty well for three games. 

Team	Score	sRPI
George Mason	57	211
UNLV	78	231
Denver	70	208
Portland St.	75	216
Belmont	48	209
New Mexico	72	224
Missouri St.	41	218
SDSU	54	228
Utah	79	242
C.Michigan	57	214
Colorado St.	82	244
Auburn	72	236
N.Texas	74	216
Lipscomb	58	206
BYU	59	242
Washington	73	242
Texas Southern	60	233
Iowa	81	257
Kansas St.	68	231
TCU	72	229
Mississippi St.	63	226
Wyoming	105	237
U Cal, Irvine	108	218
Air Force	97	197

Worst day yet for the sRPI at 8-4. Now the sRPI is 40-8 through 4 games. 

Team	Score	sRPI
Washington	58	242
Wyoming	71	237
SDSU	76	228
N.Illinois	52	206
N.Texas	66	216
Campbell	81	224
New Mexico	87	224
SJSU	89	232
BYU	56	242
Cal	70	235
Denver	72	208
Quinnipiac	54	202
Drexel	75	195
Air Force	65	197
UNLV	84	231
S.Miss	94	225
TCU	50	229
Tex A&M	60	237
Fresno St.	67	248
Utah	62	242
Missouri-KC	65	203
Tex Soutern	70	233
Gerogia	58	237
CSU	73	244

To recap the sRPI in season 39 here are a few fun facts:

Top 20 sRPI was 254.14

     -100% of the Top 20 made it to the NT.

Top 50 sRPI was 238.91

     -82% of the Top 50 made it to the NT.

     -2.6% of teams 51-324 received an invite to the NT

     -6.2% of teams 51-324 received an auto-bid by winning their conference.

Top 100 sRPI was 225.95

     -0% of teams outside the Top 100 received an invite to the NT.

     -3.4% of teams outside the Top 100 made it to the NT. 

Middle sRPI (team 162) was 215.12.

     -0% of teams 162-324 made the NT.