Have any of you noticed or attempted to track the career performances of two similarly rated players (in each individual category ie. Ath, Spd, Reb, etc.), but that differed considerably in the recruiting rankings? For example one player was a 4 star recruit vs a 2 star player... or a 2 star vs no star (but Top 100 at position). I'm wondering if the player ranked higher as a high school recruit tends to perform better if many of the factors are the same.
Also, I'm sure this is discussed in a Developer Chat or something, but how are recruit rankings generated?