Which player would you start at PG and which would you start at SG? I was thinking player #4 might actually be better as a SF or PF. I appreciate any thoughts!

Player 1:
ATH: 60
SPD: 64
REB: 10
DEF: 42
BLK: 1
LP: 17
PE: 42
BH: 51
P: 58
WE: 17
ST: 77
DU: 34
FT: B

Player 2:
ATH: 33
SPD: 73
REB: 9
DEF: 36
BLK: 11
LP: 2
PE: 39
BH: 54
P: 53
WE: 44
ST: 71
DU: 62
FT: C

Player 3:
ATH: 33
SPD: 72
REB: 1
DEF: 33
BLK: 1
LP: 20
PE: 53
BH: 53
P: 57
WE: 59
ST: 79
DU: 54
FT: B-

Player 4:
ATH:  63
SPD:  41
REB: 33
DEF: 74
BLK: 12
LP: 23
PE: 18
BH: 22
P: 29
WE: 66
ST: 66
DU: 60
FT: C+

#4 is definitely a better fit for a SF. Without seeing IQs I would start #2 at PG because with those high potentials hes going to be the best of any of those 4 pretty quickly. I would probably start 3 at SG for the speed, lp, and per. 1 can be a solid backup at both spots.

IQ's are all equal, one is coming off a FR Redshirt

#2 ath and WE are low (compared to #1). I think #1 is the best PG. #3 at SG. #4 will be an ok SF if no better options, be even better next season.

dac - I am confused, #2 has a WE of 44, #1 has a WE of 17. Did you get those flipped around? I thought speed was more important for a guard and #2's BH and P would go up quicker because the high WE.

yeah - I must have messed them up in my head...makes the choice harder...I guess 2 is better then...but if the WE was switched...lol

Right now #1 is the best PG.  2 or 3 are basically interchangeable at the 2 and either can play backup PG as well.