Posted by italyprof on 3/19/2012 8:39:00 AM (view original):
Wow zubin sum, that is seriously Machiavellian,
I don't understand what you are saying is Machiavellian.
So what accounts for all the Vince Coleman/Tim Raines offenses with 40 HRs for the whole team?
The reason why low-HR offenses are successful in the sim is that in general HRs are a losing strategy. With few exceptions, homeruns are easily normalized into doubles by deadball pitchers are big parks which leaves the owner of HR-hitting teams overpaying for offense.
So what accounts for all the Vince Coleman/Tim Raines offenses with 40 HRs for the whole team?
Both players are good bargains. They are fast switch hitters that for whatever reason perform or over-perfrom in the sim. In their best (bargain) years, both players play the OF adequately and don't leave their owners over-paying on defense. 1987 Vince Coleman is a good bargain in particular because he has adequate on base and good hitting (avg) abilities, moves from 1st to 3rd on singles and don't hit into DPs. His average isn't wasted on XBH instead he just hits singles or talks walks which is perfect for a lead-off hitter. Doing the math, Coleman's base-stealing is worth about 8 runs or 1 win per year which I admit seems low. Raines in his best years (1985-1987) provides efficient middle of the order average driven slugging. Again, being a switch hitter, his offensive stats hold up well in the sim. He is fast so he doesn't hit into DPs and can advance from 1st to 3rd on a single. The math suggests that his basestealing is only worth about 7 runs which, like Colemen, I think is low. But still my overall point is both players would be pretty good bargains even if they didn't steal bases like they do.
Is it that getting a catcher with a good arm has not yet caught on as a serious, but apparently according to all of you simple and effective way to counter the running game?
A good catcher's arm will generally counter the running game. And to that end, generally '75 Carter is all you need. However keep in mind that half of a team's ability to prevent a stolen base is the pitcher's CS stat. If you have pitchers that are horrible at preventing SBs, no catcher's arm with stop SBs. More importantly, while a good team might be driven just by stolen bases, a great team tends to be much more multi-faceted. Stolen bases are often an element of their game, but they can win without it.
Most of the teams in 1st place in my leagues (the ones crushing my teams that is) are based on that offense, hence my search for an antidote...
Can you provide a link? I am guessing that stolen bases are just one element of some of these team's overall winning strategy.
3/19/2012 5:08 PM (edited)