In HD what would it be?

Where should I start?

Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 10/14/2009In HD what would it be

It seems that IQ makes less difference than it should, especially defensively. There are a number of people who claim to almost never practice zone, but can run an effective combo defense with it. I can't say that I know it's true, but from the anecdotes, that is something that has always bothered me.

Good question.

D1 recruits

make DEF actually mean something.

which includes having less 90 DEF guys. It should be a bell curve. Very few 20's, very few 80's and lots of folk with around a 50 DEF rating.

oh, and how about a "block list". Not in the traditional sense of if you block somebody you cant read their posts...

but if you block somebody, they cannot respond in a thread that you started. so you could still read a blocked coaches comments in HD, but that blocked coach cannot hijack your thread and turn it into an online *****-slapping fest.

Just one thing? Thats tough..

We could write a book on what should be different.

Similar to what Mr P said have IQ, and DEF much more important.

If you have a PG with a C IQ he needs to be ripped up vs a PG with A IQ.

Or if a team with high DEF plays a team with low defense it needs to show, especially in M2M

Quote: Originally Posted By brip87 on 10/14/2009D1 recruit

What about D1 recruits?

Quote: Originally Posted By mrpolo09 on 10/14/2009make DEF actually mean something.

which includes having less 90 DEF guys. It should be a bell curve. Very few 20's, very few 80's and lots of folk with around a 50 DEF rating.

I like that idea, 40-60 would be the range where most guys fell in and the rest would be worked in around there. I think that that might also help the other thought about IQ too, if every one of your guys at d1 has 90+ de i could understand how IQ wouldn't be as big of a need as the kids are all superior defenders on their own. It would also add another side to recruiting, actually having to look at a players DE rating...

There are to many that are the same. More variance like d2. Recruiting in d1 in genreal needs a revamp

have each level have its own rating scale from 1-100 that way adding for more variation within a division.

(for dropdowns make up some formula where a 50 rebounder in D1 = a 80 rebounder in D2 or something)

I also want less guys with 90s in their cores, make 70s-80s the great players and 90s rare and the elite.

Something along those lines...

Of course you would have to readjust ratings in DIII and DII also to make this work in someway..

Quote: Originally Posted By brip87 on 10/14/2009
There are to many that are the same. More variance like d2. Recruiting in d1 in genreal needs a revamp

This is coming in the next release , FYI. But I agree 100% with you on this.

Quote: Originally Posted By indiansrck27 on 10/14/2009

I also want less guys with 90s in their cores, make 70s-80s the great players and 90s rare and the elite.

Something along those lines...

Of course you would have to readjust ratings in DIII and DII also to make this work in someway..

Great idea. This would actually fit perfect with tannermc's suggestion.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.