i think the frequency of injuries right now is okay. do you guys agree?
but, there is no correlation (or very , very little) between a players DU and the odds that he will be one of the guys that gets a nagging little injury that drops him to 80% or so for a couple of games. It seems like i prolbably get about 2 of these per season. sometimes it oculd be three, sometimes one, but im guessing two per season... sound about right?
i actually wouldnt mind if it was slightly more severe than that... as long as it was tied to DU. that probably is not great for realism (its hard to predict who will get hurt) but its great for strategy as you will have to decide whether to recruit the slightly better player who tends to get injured once or twice per season, or the guy who is not quite as talented, but never gets injured.
I am not a big fan of the sever injuries that drop a playe to 40% and make him miss a big chunk of the season (and i really am not a fan of injured playes losing ratings points) but, i guess i could support the idea of seeing sever injuries occasionally, but i would definitely want it tied very closely to DU. I might even like it if seble came out and said "players with DU>25 will not get severe injuries, players with DU<25 are at risk and coaches should factor that in during recruiting"... or something like that
Does that make anuy sense? and do you think that is what seble is trying to do?