Question about C’s & M2M Topic

Ok, so I've been struggling over this for a while. I can't decide over 2 recruits, so I was wondering what you guys would think. What's more important in a Motion/M2M team, a C with really high LP, SB, REB, but low DEF, or a C with Good LP, REB, DEF and low SB. Any thoughts would be very appreciated! Thanks.
2/10/2010 4:29 PM
If you're distinguishing between "really high" and "good," then I'd be OK with the low DEF.



But if by really high and good you mean the same - so basically you're just choosing between DEF and SB, I'm not sure.
2/10/2010 4:41 PM
Depends what the difference in "really high" and good is. If the "really high" is like 20+ higher then "good" then him. All things even though, I'd take the shot blocking over def for my bigs, but def over sb for my pf.
2/10/2010 4:43 PM
What are the potentials like? If the good is say 50 with High potential and the high is say 60 with Low potential then I would take the "good".
2/10/2010 4:47 PM
Sorry I should have specified better...

C #1 REB: 68 w/ high pot. DEF: 37 w/ avg SB: 69 w/ high LP: 70 w/ high

C #2 REB: 49 w/ high pot. DEF: 51 w/ high SB: 37 w/ avg. LP: 69 w/ avg.

I like players to have good defense so this decision is a little harder than it looks. Thanks.
2/10/2010 5:25 PM
ath/speed? Based on just that, its simple. Player #1 and it isn't close.
2/10/2010 5:33 PM
Yep. Even 35? Def isn't worth 20 points of rebounding, 40 points of SB and 10? of LP.

#1 by a lot, even on a man team.



2/10/2010 5:42 PM
#2 has slightly better ath,spd, and passing.
2/10/2010 5:42 PM
would have to be a huge difference in ath/speed. I'm talking like a 80 to a 20 or something to really sway it in favor or player 2.
2/10/2010 5:43 PM
Question about C’s & M2M Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.