the current master-blaster league is 58 games into the season. the parity is stout. even with uva's, (pacific) sexual napalm team (.776), 8 of his 13 losses have come from primarily the midwest (loaded from top to bottom) and the eastern divs (where dh555 rules with onslaughts of 3's. however, uva is eating alive his divisional foes at a 27-3 clip (burp!).
therefore, i think the overall concept of the league, where the owners draft by position (pre-determined positions - 100% eligible -whether it's pg's in the first round then sf's in the 2nd, or even centers going 1st or in 4th rounds, etc.) worked well. drafting mandatory positions at the same time with the other owners was a challenge. it seems to shift the focus to eyeing the other guy's roster more.
the draft order was determined in the first season by first-come-first-served. that was ok since it was the first season. i think a second season should be determined the same as the ODL (i agree with gary) with an owner choosing closer to 1st or closer to 24th. I think the owner's order of finish the previous season would determine when he gets to choose his "closer" request.
the draft order of the owners seems to become more important as soon as the league knows what order the positions will be selected. this is what i see as the priority in getting right. but am unsure of how to proceed. a random selection by positions? that idea creates a lot more mystery and challenge and luck than would a set framework of like this year: SF-1st rnd, PF-2nd, PG-3rd, SG-4th and C-5th with the 6th picking 2 backups at the same time (no more than 2600 mins ea.)