The Swiss Consulate Topic

Apparently, I need an intermediary to communicate with HD Central. I just sent in a ticket that seems to have vanished into cyberspace. Here was my point.

I have a Sr. SF (Aho) at St. Johns, in Allen, (my first season there) who hasn't improved a single point in 12 games (and 2 exh games) this season. He plays 16 mins, avgs 11 ppg, and has an 88 WE. He's only at 743 total, so one might think there is some room for improvement somewhere. He's not all tapped out with 98s and 99s.

Update: He has a 'limited upside' in 12 categories. (Twelve!)

I simply asked for a comment on what seems to be a strange situation.

But "poof!" My ticket is nowhere to be found.

If I no longer enjoy diplomatic relations with the Republic of WIS, then I'm importuning a neutral coach, in good standing, to inquire as to my status.

(A brief history will follow.)
6/7/2010 11:21 AM
Back in the day, I sent alot of tickets about various aspects of the game. Almost always whining about some result that I thought was too extreme. In the larger context, they comprised a log of outliers offered to demonstrate that, in my mind, they were too frequent and/or too bizarre. Tarik, intentionally, always handled them.

My position on this is no secret. If coaches are constrained (as it has to be in a computer game) in the tactics they can employ, then I feel that that limitation warrants a bit of contraction in the amount of variabilty a coach should have to face. In short, reign in the randomness a little. (Don't eliminate it.)

Most of the time, Tarik would send back a response, often as sarcastic and biting as the ticket I sent to him, and usually with a boxscore or headline from a real NCAA game showing a similar situation. At the WIS "get togethers" we never talked very long without referencing my tickets and he'd typically launch right into more defense that they had the randomness thing, just about right.

Ahhh, those were the days!

So, anyway...

The new management was not so tolerant nor prone to intellectual jousting.

One day I looked at my ticket history (I had stopped checking after every missive because they didn't always warrant, or get, responses) to find that the New Boss had sent me a note to the effect that they did not appreciate my recurring tickets. They said if I didn't stop, they'd cut off my privileges.

Unfortunately, I had already launched a couple between the time they "warned" me and the time I saw that note.

From here, it gets vague.

I promptly responded that I knew full welll that I was sending in tickets to make the grander point, and that I didn't really expect responses to them. (Hence the extended period where I didn't check for responses.) I further told them that I hadn't timely seen their warning and that I would stop sending them and, in the future, only send in a ticket for something that really deserved one. (Like the one above.)

I think after they sent me the warning, but before I read it, they took offfense at the couple of tickets I had fired off in the interim. I attempted to explain that. I never intended to send that kind of ticket after they specifically objected to them.

That seems to have fallen on deaf ears.

The last, visible, dated ticket from me in Allen is from April 2009.

I don't know if they still actually can receive a ticket from me (and just ignore it) or whether the system simply disposes of it upon sending, so they don't even know one was sent.

I think a sentence of banishment for over a year more than adequately fits the crime. Especially when I "behaved" from the minute I saw their note.

So, if anyone cares to use their diplomatic relations to intercede for me (like we use the Swiss to communicate with Iran, etc.) I would appreciate it. I'd like to know if I have correctly interpreted the situation and, more importantly, how do I apply for parole?
6/7/2010 11:21 AM
What were his potentials?

He could very well be tapped out. . .
6/7/2010 11:24 AM
Quote: Originally posted by arssanguinus on 6/07/2010What were his potentials?

He could very well be tapped out. . .

+1
6/7/2010 11:32 AM
Well, let me be the first to suggest an expletive laced email.
6/7/2010 11:43 AM
Quote: Originally posted by hypnotoad on 6/07/2010Well, let me be the first to suggest an expletive laced email.


I knew that this would catch on. ;-)
6/7/2010 11:48 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By tannermcc on 6/07/2010
Quote: Originally posted by arssanguinus on 6/07/2010 What were his potentials?

He could very well be tapped out. . .

+


if this player with this type of overall rating literally cannot improve any more regardless of circumstance then potential needs more tweaking
6/7/2010 11:52 AM
Quote: Originally posted by dogget on 6/07/2010Apparently, I need an intermediary to communicate with HD Central.  I just sent in a ticket that seems to have vanished into cyberspace.  Here was my point.I have a Sr. SF (Aho) at St. Johns, in Allen, (my first season there) who hasn't improved a single point in 12 games (and 2 exh games) this season.  He plays 16 mins, avgs 11 ppg, and has an 88 WE.  He's only at 743 total, so one might think there is some room for improvement somewhere.  He's not all tapped out with 98s and 99s.I simply asked for a comment on what seems to be a strange situation.But "poof!"  My ticket is nowhere to be found.If I no longer enjoy diplomatic relations with the Republic of WIS, then I'm importuning a neutral coach, in good standing, to inquire as to my status.(A brief history will follow.)
The whole point of the "potential" upgrade was that people "Max Out" in each attribute at a different level.

Some attributes max out a 99, others at 59.
6/7/2010 11:52 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 6/07/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By tannermcc on 6/07/2010

Quote: Originally posted by arssanguinus on 6/07/2010
What were his potentials?

He could very well be tapped out. . .

+1



if this player with this type of overall rating literally cannot improve any more regardless of circumstance then potential needs more tweaking
It has been tweaked, but that isn't going to effect seiors who were tapped out allready before the season even began.
6/7/2010 11:54 AM
Exactly. I have had players max out in all cores as early as their Soph. season. In addition, they were players with high Dur., Sta., and WE. The result were players that maybe had only 1 or 2 pts of improvement this deep into a season. So 0 points of improvement although rare, it not out of the realm of possibility.
6/7/2010 11:58 AM
All of the above posts were before I added the history, above.

6/7/2010 11:58 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 6/07/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By tannermcc on 6/07/2010

Quote: Originally posted by arssanguinus on 6/07/2010
What were his potentials?

He could very well be tapped out. . .

+1



if this player with this type of overall rating literally cannot improve any more regardless of circumstance then potential needs more tweaking
vandydave for president!
6/7/2010 11:59 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By ericbfor3 on 6/07/2010Exactly. I have had players max out in all cores as early as their Soph. season. In addition, they were players with high Dur., Sta., and WE. The result were players that maybe had only 1 or 2 pts of improvement this deep into a season. So 0 points of improvement although rare, it not out of the realm of possibility.
I'm not ruling out such an explanation. But with 40 BH, 59 Reb, 54 LP, and (c'mon!) 19 Shot blocking, it's just surprising that he hasn't moved an inch.

But as you can see, the issue has gone beyond that.
6/7/2010 12:10 PM
I can't imagine they aren't receiving your tickets. They probably are being typical CS and don't want to answer them because their isn't a vague, blanket response they can give. If they give more than that, then they open themselves up for the type of "discussion" you were referring to with Tarik, which they obviously don't want.
6/7/2010 12:39 PM
I want to thank whoever is asking seble, et. al., what my circumstance is. I know you're working behind the scenes and getting the answer.
6/7/2010 11:58 PM
12 Next ▸
The Swiss Consulate Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.