I took over at Colgate 4 years ago. The school prestige was D- and the RPI was 211 the year before. I decided, from the beginning, to schedule weak, get as many wins as possible, drive my prestige up, get the best recruits possible and hoped to make the NT by the 4th year. My SOS was never under 200, usually over 250.
Year 1 W-L: 16-14 RPI: 182 Prestige: D
Year 2 W-L: 18-9 RPI: 140 Prestige: D+
Year 3 W-L: 27-3 RPI: 42 Prestige: C NT (1st rd.)
Year 4 W-L: 27-4 RPI: 62 Prestige: C+ NT (2nd rd.)
I just applied for a much better job, in an elite conf., and have a good shot at getting it. If I don't I have many better jobs than Colgate that I qualify for. There were, in fact, only 4 openings that I do not qualify for!
A couple of conf. mates decided to go a different rout. They scheduled much tougher opponents, hoping to get a higher RPI going into conf. play and have a better shot at the NT. Here is where the more successful one of the two is today (Keep in mind both of these coaches are every bit as good as me if not better, just had a different way of scheduling which, in my mind, made the difference).
The year before this coach took over his team had an RPI of 294 with a D- prestige, almost exactly where I started with Colgate.
Year 1 W-L: 20-9 RPI: 162 Prestige: D-
Year 2 W-L: 20-9 RPI: 59 Prestige: C- NT (1st rd.)
Year 3 W-L: 17-12 RPI: 119 Prestige: C-
Year 4 W-L: 20-9 RPI: 94 Prestige: C PI (1st rd.)
As good as this coach is and as successful as he was at turning his program around, he is having a much harder time finding a better job. Out of 15 mid-majors he is looking at he only qualified for 1 of them. Again, he is probably a better coach than I am and we had some great battles against each other with both of us winning our share, but because of his overall record, which I believe could have been much better with a weaker schedule, he is really having it rough job hunting. Good luck and I hope this helps!