Say a player is at the "fairly fresh" level, is he any better at shooting the three than a "getting tired" or "tired" player? In reality, you wouldn't think it would much at all  (unless that player is about to pass out and can't even throw the ball up) but this game isn't reality so it is not really safe to assume anything either. Anyone know the answer?

And if the answer is yes, how much do think fatigue affects a player's perimeter skills?

No one knows...

Feel free to comment if you do, I would kind of like to know this before 2:30-ish AM

yes he is better, but the decline is not linear - its more asymptotic.  The player really starts to lose his accuracy as he gets to tired and really tired.  There is not much difference between fairly fresh and getting tired. a little maybe. I'm sure others will agree or give there opinion, but I thought I would get you at least one response before 230am.  lol

Thanks, at least I got one answer.

your welcome -

Hey, since your here, do you think a center that has 11ATH & 83 LP ever has a chance to be a decent scorer (we're talking d-3 right now). These days I would never take a big man with such low athleticism, but I signed him in my first season of recruiting in a LONG TIME (18 seasons to be exact).

Sorry for the randomness, but there was no point in starting another thread that won't get commented on.

A center with low ATH and high LP will score plenty... sort of. Depending on your team - and not forcing him to shoot a bunch - and not double teamed - AND if he has decent REB - and a higher offensive IQ - then he can be very good. Think upperclassman who plays within the flow plus tip-ins.

What kind of rebounder is he?

Just 49 REB, he's a sophomore. 

http://whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=13674&pid=1710962

I would up his distro a little. He can score at above a .500 clip.