Has it outlived its usefulness?

I can completely understand why you'd want to have a system with baseline prestige in place during the inaugural seasons of a new world.  But after 50 or so seasons, couldn't you now use a weighted team history to formulate prestige?

The system in place is too restrictive imo.  Make the process of obtaining an A+ prestige very easy for certain team, very difficult for others ... but never impossible.  As a 'what-if' game, there shouldn't be hard barriers on what a coach can or cannot achieve.

Posted by survivor45 on 4/25/2011 10:15:00 AM (view original):
Has it outlived its usefulness?

I can completely understand why you'd want to have a system with baseline prestige in place during the inaugural seasons of a new world.  But after 50 or so seasons, couldn't you now use a weighted team history to formulate prestige?

The system in place is too restrictive imo.  Make the process of obtaining an A+ prestige very easy for certain team, very difficult for others ... but never impossible.  As a 'what-if' game, there shouldn't be hard barriers on what a coach can or cannot achieve.

+1