I am going to try the same strategy with a player I have who has some things in common. So I am interested, and not trying to burst your bubble, but using the simple efficiency formula of tot pts / (fga + .5* fta) nets him a 505 / 453 or just a little over 110% efficiency which is not real good for a SG, SF or PF star
I have a near identical player I am playing as a -1 PF for the past two seasons - have to think about it - lots more options in the game than the 'good old' days that is for sure.
http://whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=4475&pid=1803491
| Yr. |
GP |
GS |
MIN |
FG% |
FG3% |
FT% |
OREB |
REB |
AST |
TO |
STL |
BLK |
PF |
PTS |
| 52 |
15 |
15 |
22.0 |
.527 |
.333 |
.857 |
1.7 |
5.3 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
11.9 |
| 51 |
32 |
0 |
21.5 |
.533 |
.316 |
.845 |
1.0 |
3.5 |
1.8 |
1.1 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
1.3 |
9.7 |
| 50 |
31 |
31 |
22.6 |
.479 |
.280 |
.877 |
1.3 |
4.3 |
1.6 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
2.3 |
5.5 |
| Averages |
|
|
|
.517 |
.308 |
.856 |
1.2 |
4.2 |
1.7 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
8.5 |
| Yr. |
GP |
GS |
MIN |
FGM |
FGA |
FG3M |
FG3A |
FTM |
FTA |
OFF |
REB |
AST |
TO |
STL |
BLK |
PF |
PTS |
| 52 |
15 |
15 |
330 |
69 |
131 |
5 |
15 |
36 |
42 |
25 |
80 |
24 |
19 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
179 |
| 51 |
32 |
0 |
687 |
106 |
199 |
12 |
38 |
87 |
103 |
33 |
111 |
58 |
34 |
23 |
16 |
42 |
311 |
| 50 |
31 |
31 |
702 |
57 |
119 |
7 |
25 |
50 |
57 |
39 |
134 |
50 |
26 |
27 |
19 |
71 |
171 |
| Totals |
78 |
46 |
1719 |
232 |
449 |
24 |
78 |
173 |
202 |
97 |
325 |
132 |
79 |
64 |
49 |
128 |
661 |
6/28/2011 4:12 PM (edited)