14/14 coll/HS scouting


#1 - 19 years old, 26 durability, 72 health, 22 patience, 43 makeup

current-projected= Stamina: 57-77, Control: 67-93, vs LHB: 50-72, vs RHB: 52-72, Vel: 68-82, GB-FB: 74-90, p1 80-98, p2 66-74, p3 54-79, p4 31-44

#2 - 19 years old, 30 durabillity, 100 health, 81 patience, 69 makeup

current-projected= Stamina: 63-73, Control: 74-94, vs LHB: 49-66, vs RHB: 57-69, Vel: 73-78, GB-FB: 42-47, p1 88-96, p2 69-75, p3 37-54, p4 38-52 p5 20-28

#1 clearly has the better projecteds, but I'm worried about that low makeup.. #2 seems like a more sure bet to be a good pitcher, but #1 could be a superstar.. will #1 gain enough to justify taking him over #2? Or should I play it safer and go with #2 instead? Sorry, I'm still relatively new and couldn't find many examples of a SP with that low of a makeup rating. Perhaps that's telling enough.

2/4/2012 4:16 PM
Superstar may be a reach, but he could be very solid. Where are you drafting at? I'd go with #1 if you aren't in a rebuild where you need a surefire player, and I'd take a chance.
2/4/2012 4:40 PM
I have the 5th pick. And I should have said all-star.
2/4/2012 4:50 PM
14 mil is good but could leave some margin for error.  Id focus on current ratings and make-up.  43 make up wont make for good development or injury recovery.
2/4/2012 4:55 PM
I wouldn't say #1 is going to be an all-star but he will give you a lot of quality innings and he's better than #2
2/4/2012 5:04 PM
I wouldn't be very happy with either at #5. Are you debating them for #5 on your board? If so, you'll get somebody higher on your board.
2/4/2012 10:34 PM
But that said, #1 over #2.
2/4/2012 10:36 PM

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.