In Allen, we've got something interesting shaping up because of the degree of dominance that the ACC  - and this year, the Big 12 - have been displaying:

RPI:

1.	N. Carolina St.	A+	fmschwab	ACC	18-2	.6344	8	.7118
2.	Texas	A	jslotman	Big 12	20-1	.6228	14	.7099
3.	Oklahoma St.	A-	cornfused	Big 12	18-3	.6514	3	.7079
4.	Maryland	A+	viperhoops	ACC	16-5	.6689	1	.7071
5.	UNC	A+	girt25	ACC	16-4	.6588	2	.7054
6.	Virginia	A+	wang35	ACC	18-3	.6231	13	.6907
7.	Kansas	A+	jamespastine	Big 12	15-5	.6369	7	.6868
8.	Duke	A+	acn24	ACC	16-4	.6215	15	.6819
9.	Colorado	A	reinsel	Big 12	15-5	.6480	4	.6783
10.	Temple	B+	cimmy426	A10	19-1	.5734	42	.6730
11.	Boston College	A+	brikeisco	ACC	16-5	.6261	11	.6727
12.	Michigan St.	A+	Iguana1	Big 10	17-3	.5841	36	.6590
13.	Syracuse	A+	steginman	Big East	18-2	.5785	41	.6578
14.	Wisconsin	A	rogers	Big 10	18-2	.5698	46	.6565

Rankings:

1.	N. Carolina St.	18-2	1137	2
	Last Game: W 49-73 v. Virginia Tech (2/8)
2.	Texas	20-1	1118	3
	Last Game: W 67-74 v. #1 Oklahoma St. (2/8)
3.	Oklahoma St.	18-3	1117	1
	Last Game: L 67-74 at #3 Texas (2/8)
4.	Maryland	16-5	1111	5
	Last Game: W 57-42 at Florida St. (2/8)
5.	Syracuse	18-2	1105	4
	Last Game: W 53-91 v. Georgetown (2/8)
6.	Temple	19-1	1096	7
	Last Game: W 50-60 v. George Washington (2/7)
7.	Virginia	18-3	1090	6
	Last Game: L 63-76 at #12 Boston College (2/8)
8.	Wisconsin	18-2	1087	8
	Last Game: W 71-58 at Purdue (2/8)
9.	Michigan St.	17-3	1079	9
	Last Game: W 63-62 at Minnesota (2/8)

Projection report:

1.	N. Carolina St.	ACC	fmschwab	1	1	8	18-2	6-0	12-2	0-0	8-2	Lock
2.	Texas	Big 12	jslotman	2	2	14	20-1	9-0	11-1	0-0	9-1	Lock
3.	Maryland	ACC	viperhoops	4	4	1	16-5	6-1	10-4	0-0	5-5	Lock
4.	Oklahoma St.	Big 12	cornfused	3	3	3	18-3	8-1	10-2	0-0	8-2	Lock
5.	Colorado	Big 12	reinsel	10	9	4	15-5	7-2	8-3	0-0	6-4	Lock
6.	UNC	ACC	girt25	12	5	2	16-4	6-1	10-3	0-0	7-3	Lock
7.	Virginia	ACC	wang35	7	6	13	18-3	4-1	14-2	0-0	7-3	Lock
8.	Syracuse	Big East	steginman	5	13	41	18-2	10-1	8-1	0-0	10-0	Lock
9.	Wisconsin	Big 10	rogers	8	14	46	18-2	4-1	14-1	0-0	8-2	Lock
10.	Michigan St.	Big 10	Iguana1	9	12	36	17-3	5-1	12-2	0-0	8-2	Lock
11.	Kansas	Big 12	jamespastine	14	7	7	15-5	7-0	8-5	0-0	7-3	Lock
12.	Duke	ACC	acn24	15	8	15	16-4	9-0	7-4	0-0	7-3	Lock
13.	Boston College	ACC	brikeisco	11	11	11	16-5	3-2	13-3	0-0	5-5	Lock
14.	Temple	A10	cimmy426	6	10	42	19-1	7-0	12-1	0-0	10-0	Lock

So you'll notice that the top four teams - NC State, Texas, OK State, and Maryland - are the same in all three rankings, even if the order changes slightly.  The problem, though, is that they're in each other's conferences.

While the consensus is clearly that those teams should be the one seeds, that can't possibly be the case, can it?  Say chalk holds - Syracuse and Temple win their CTs; MSU def Wisconsin in the CT final; NC State def Maryland in the CT final with UNC and Virginia as semifinalists and Duke and BC only in the quarterfinal; Texas def OK State in the CT final with Kansas and Colorado as semifinalists.

Who are the 1 seeds? 

P.S. - in the real world, there are two #1 seeds from the same conference all of the time.  Given the consolidation of power in Allen to basically two conferences (plus four or five other teams) now, I can see the four #1's coming from two conferences. 

I'm saying, though, will it?  The WCAA selection committee has typically been more influenced by the CT than has the NCAA committee.

Can I drop down to a three seed?  That should minimize my chances of a second round ACC loss. 

IIRC, the ACC in Phelan had all 4 No.1 seeds two or three seasons ago, so it can happen.

ACC now have three of four in the projection report (though I honestly don't think UNC would be on the top line if this were the real NCAA Selection Committee).