For whatever reason, I always seem to end up with SGs at the 3, even in D1...

Seems like you can get get better value by recruiting SGs and what I usually give up in terms of LP and REB, I feel I can more than make up for with generally better ATH/SPD/DEF/ PER/PA/BH

Anybody else have similar experiences?

that's been my general observation as well, though I've had some really talented SFs also

Actually, I have ended up with more sfs playing guard or post positions than playing sf.

seems balanced to me

I think at D2 and D3 that is often the case. But at the high level of D1, at least you will get stud SFs to play SF. However, it still isn't uncommon to have a SG, PF, or C play SF. For example last season on my WVU team I had a PF playing SF, and this season I have a SG playing SF, but next season my starting and backup SFs will both be SFs.

Posted by a_in_the_b on 5/3/2012 5:23:00 PM (view original):
Actually, I have ended up with more sfs playing guard or post positions than playing sf.

ditto     

My best SF sofar is a PF.  The guy I have right now.

I love getting a really talented SF. Speed, ath, defender, can shoot and rebound. usually a mismatch, and if they can pass....ooohhhhh, music to my ears. I think I picked one up today actually. 

Posted by ryandaniel on 5/3/2012 9:02:00 PM (view original):
My best SF sofar is a PF.  The guy I have right now.

Clark?  If you play him at SF he will turn it over a ton.

Erk.  Center.  I mean Center.