Athleticism	31	High		Perimeter	46	Low
Speed	40	Average		Ball Handling	27	Low
Rebounding	10	High		Passing	37	High
Defense	42	High		Stamina	58	High
Shot Blocking	9	Average		Durability	18	Average
Low-post	32	Low		FT Shooting		High

Athleticism	32	High		Perimeter	12	Average
Speed	31	Average		Ball Handling	17	High
Rebounding	58	Average		Passing	15	High
Defense	30	High		Stamina	70	High
Shot Blocking	32	High		Durability	54	High
Low-post	31	Average		FT Shooting		Low

Athleticism	52	Average		Perimeter	21	High
Speed	30	Average		Ball Handling	24	High
Rebounding	28	Average		Passing	22	High
Defense	38	High		Stamina	54	High
Shot Blocking	15	Average		Durability	66	High
Low-post	19	Low		FT Shooting		Average

D3, zone defense, motion offense. No info on High-High.

#1 isn't really good at anything
#2 looks like a backup SF/PF type
#3 is bad

I guess #2

Posted by Trentonjoe on 8/17/2012 8:39:00 PM (view original):
#1 isn't really good at anything
#2 looks like a backup SF/PF type
#3 is bad

I guess #2

#3 isn't bad. I would also say 2, but it's close (between 2 and 3).

I should note that this is for a career backup spot... Not looking for much more than a role player.

What role are you looking to fill?  Just someone to eat up minutes and not kill your team? If that is the case I would look for the best combination of ATH and Def.  Without knowing the High potentials I would consider #3.  A mid 60s Ath and about 60 Def is definitely acceptable at DIII.  Plus, you never know that perimeter might turn into something. His passing and ball handling won't kill you either.  If you just need someone to come in to grab a few boards, then #2.  I would eliminate #1 from the debate. This is for a small forward, right?

Posted by milwood on 8/17/2012 9:15:00 PM (view original):
What role are you looking to fill?  Just someone to eat up minutes and not kill your team? If that is the case I would look for the best combination of ATH and Def.  Without knowing the High potentials I would consider #3.  A mid 60s Ath and about 60 Def is definitely acceptable at DIII.  Plus, you never know that perimeter might turn into something. His passing and ball handling won't kill you either.  If you just need someone to come in to grab a few boards, then #2.  I would eliminate #1 from the debate. This is for a small forward, right?

This. I think player 3 is the surest bet.

what are the work ethics?

Posted by trobone on 8/17/2012 9:26:00 PM (view original):
what are the work ethics?

All mid-50s

1 and 3 are useless. Where would you play him? 60 ath/60 def might look good, but without speed, he can't guard backcourts. No sb, not really good at guarding bigs. Only #2 can actually play a position (pf) should his reb get to 70. 

Tianyi, I agree with you 100% that  #2 would be the better player to backup the PF slot.  I overlooked his speed suggesting that #3 would be the better SF.  Along with speed for SF I also look for the best combination of BH and Pa for my SF.  Number 3 is starting off 7 points higher in both categories, would you still consider #2 if the position needed is SF.  I agree speed is very important for SF, but what is the cut off or BH and passing.   How much speed would you sacrifice for BH and passing.  Would you rather 65 sp and 35 for bh and pa, or 50 sp with 50 bh and pa?  At DIII, of course

It really would be better to post projections rather than ratings + potential.  You just gave those potentials to everyone on the forums who may not have FSSed the appropriate states.

Posted by dahsdebater on 8/18/2012 1:06:00 AM (view original):
It really would be better to post projections rather than ratings + potential.  You just gave those potentials to everyone on the forums who may not have FSSed the appropriate states.

The names aren't there, and I altered all the ratings so someone can't just search by rating and find the player.