Here are their starting values as freshman, and their potentials. Which is a better SF? This is for D3, and I play triangle, M2M.

Player A:
ATH       55      Medium
SPD      40      Low
REB      27     Low
DEF      52     Medium
SB     16           High (unknown)
LP     17          High (high)
PER     13     High (low)
BH     19     High (unknown)
PAS     28     Low
WE      40
STA     68     High
FT          67%     Low

Player 2:
ATH     52     Medium
SPD     49     Medium
REB     24     Low
DEF     58     Low
SB          15     Low
LP          35     High (unknown)
PER     15     Low
BH          36     Medium
PAS       15     Low
WE          45
STA          60     High
FT          66%     Low

I'd take A, especially if you have a redshirt year available.

Thanks - that's the guy I'd decided to go for too. Just felt he had more upside, despite the low(ish) speed.

I wouldn't post their exact rating with potentials.  You're giving the potentials to people who haven't FSSed their state(s), with enough ratings to precisely ID who they are.  With that said, I don't particularly love either of them.  Neither of them passes as well as I like my SFs to.  I'd probably prefer A, but only marginally.

Posted by dahsdebater on 10/15/2012 2:08:00 PM (view original):
I wouldn't post their exact rating with potentials.  You're giving the potentials to people who haven't FSSed their state(s), with enough ratings to precisely ID who they are.  With that said, I don't particularly love either of them.  Neither of them passes as well as I like my SFs to.  I'd probably prefer A, but only marginally.

Recruiting's already over. And yeah, I don't love either of them either - this was my last recruiting spot to fill - but I figured I could live with A because of his ath / def and his upside offensively.