Is this player worthy of a late round draft pick out of D2?

Athleticism	69	1
Speed	95	1
Rebounding	2
Defense	69
Shot Blocking	6	1
Low-post	64	1
Perimeter	96
Ball Handling	93	1
Passing	78
Work Ethic	92	3
Stamina	87	1
Durability	68	1
FT Shooting	C+

If no, what about when his other stats/accolades are included (as I believe it was noted somewhere that these are taken into consideration too)

2x NPOY
2x 1st Team AA
1x 3rd Team AA
1 National Championship

3155 career points, 372 Assists, 185 Steals

A crap shoot to predict guys getting drafted from D2 ... that said, I think he's going to get drafted, and very possibly a good bit before late second rate. What an absolute beast for D2.

I think he will get drafted late first.

He obliterated the Points Record, wow!  Creasy really benefited off of the assists to him too, lol

On a side note, Saying that simulated players name (Creasy) makes me think of "Man on Fire" and that little girl screaming his name when he's shot

that dude is amazing... i have started guys like him on d1 championship teams

the most impressive stat out of many impressive stats may be the nearly 200 steals in spite of playing zone.

He's kind of weak at the free throw line :)

and he's got pointy knees...

no draft for mr. flinn :(

Posted by bow2dacowz on 11/28/2012 8:37:00 AM (view original):
no draft for mr. flinn :(

that's a shame. What a player he was.

I would think he'd need higher ATH to get drafted. Pretty sure I've had 2 guys drafted from D2 teams both were guards with 80+ ath/80+sp with high per/bh/pa. The NPOYs would have been a big help in the past, but it doesn't even matter much in D1 anymore so I doubt it matters at all if a player wins D2 NPOY. 

are players drafted by their listed position and listed position only?  Or, can cores relate to any position?  I'm asking, can a listed PG be drafted as a SF if the cores fit the bill for that?

Seble said he made a change to the logic that players draft position was based on a rating system that identified their position regardless of their draft position. So in theory a PG can now be evaluated as a SF if he has a 50 REB but 70bh/70pa. Before the change this player would be looked at as a PG who wasn't a very good ball handler or passer whereas now he's looked at as a SF with pretty good ball handling and passing. 

hrmmm, very interesting.  Thanks, kmason.