Posted by thewizard17 on 2/13/2016 3:57:00 PM (view original):
I believe part of it is because, if you're playing zone, you aren't doing much defensively to tire the other team out. It also allows the other team's better players, aka starting 5, to stay in the game longer. Most of the other team's starting 5 are typically juniors and seniors, which have had a couple of years to improve their free throw grade.
I'm also thinking, since zone doesn't typically foul compared to other defenses, there will be a higher percentage of free throw attempts towards the end of the game where you need to put the other team's best free throw shooter at the line.
Both of these factors would explain the 5% difference.
I acknowledge there could be something to this, but we've run a fair amount of up tempo. Enough to where we draw 22.9 fouls a game, good for 23rd in D-II. We do a fair amount of getting into people's benches through foul trouble.
Your comment on seniors & juniors makes a little more sense to me. If zone = less tired players, then zone teams should shoot free throws better than others because of less fatigue/more playing time. Of the top 18 free throw shooting teams (>74%) in D-II iba, 5 were zone teams, 6 press & 7 were man. What I did notice is a lot of upperclassmen dominated rosters.
I'm still not sure it explains the full 5% difference. I might look at this for press teams, where you would expect lower free throw shooting percentages by opponents.