Posted by thewizard17 on 7/6/2019 8:11:00 PM (view original):
Posted by pallas on 7/6/2019 7:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dacamel14 on 7/6/2019 7:21:00 PM (view original):
Reducing promised minutes has a detrimental effect on your recruiting actions. Some recruits will basically write you off after reducing their promised minutes to the point that no amount of effort will ever get them interested in your school again.
This.
And also, fifteen minutes are enough to get the Want to Play preference to "Very Good" if the recruit has it. I might be wrong, but I don't think there is any extra recruiting benefit to promising twenty or twenty-five minutes.
Why wouldn't there be? Seble even stated there were different levels of very good.
i believe what seble was saying there (even though im not familiar with what he said) is effectively that each preference is a continuum, let's say from -10 to +10 (doesn't matter what it really is). neutral might be -2 to 2, good might be 3 to 6.5, and very good 6.5 to 10 - or whatever.
even though not all very goods are created equal, most likely, the practical difference between a very high very good vs a very low very good is pretty small. for some other stuff like success and value of a conference, i suspect its pretty easy to be a 10/10 very good (or whatever), i don't think its the case where a team with 5 straight titles is going to have an advantage over a team with 5 straight s16s, because that 5 straight s16s is already decent above what it takes to get to very good (i think - and if i'm off on the details, i don't think i'm off on the general concept), so its already a 10/10 or damn close.