I've been debating this all season and still can't figure out what works best. On a team lacking great passing who would you run at point, player A is your traditional assist point guard by a wide margin, however is a liability on def and offers little to no scoring. Player B is a plus defender and has the athleticism to get to the rim, but gets turned over by quick guards. I think the question comes down to how much more does the game value defense vs offense, I'm leaning towards Player B and running slow downs to limit number of possessions.

	Pos.	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT	TOT
Player A	PG	57	84	14	38	3	36	53	80	75	67	84	66	C-	657
Player B	SG	70	79	16	80	15	28	58	63	62	69	80	63	B-	683

I probably would play Player B .. I would not have recruited Player A with that defense.

But, I hate turnovers too. Based on stats (I know, stats don't matter .. just ratings .. but still) I might shift to Player A if the turnovers are just too much.

Man to Man defense. Player B, and I don't think it is even close.