Yes, on the 1B factor in performance histories.
I’m not sure the exact mechanics of the + play calculation, but would guess it’s something like a curve on where an exact average RRF essentially equals a multiplier of 1 (so no change to the outcome) and RRF above and below that curve up/down, respectively to create a multiplier that would be close to .975 for the best A+ (and similarly a .975 Multiploer on the out decision for the worst of the D-) fielders. That would work out close to around 40+/- plays over the course of the season for the best/worst.
So, in practice, if it was already decided to be a hit a thousand-sided due is rolled and if it’s 1-974 then it stays a hit, if it’s 975-1000, then it might be an out or a reduced XBH, or no change at all depending on the RRF of the fielder. Or something like that or at least works out that way practically speaking.