1) Explain why I've never won a game (with this ID) in DI (which is not even your question as much as it's Dalters)
I don't dedicate the time needed to this. I refuse to wake up in the middle of the night to recruit, and we all know recruiting is the main tool needed to be successful. From 11:00pm - 8:00am, I'm busy sleeping or taking care of family issues. As I'm sure you know, missing three straight cycles is very costly. I also travel quite a bit and miss complete days of recruiting. As much as we like to preach "coaching", players win or lose games. I also do not pay attention to the development and/or changes to gameplay. Had I stayed at Tulane, I would have won quite a few NT games, but I ditched for a lower Big 6 school. I don't use any of this as an excuse, but you asked so that's the deal.
2) State whether you think you are a good coach and why
In pure gameplanning on a level field (similar rated teams etc.), I believe I'm an excellent coach. That being said, I've never once claimed to be a "good DI coach"....mainly, because I don't recruit as well as I need to. I was caught traveling two seasons ago when I had 5 walk on's at SC....which would explain the sub .500 records the last two seasons. So with that, overall, I'd say I am just average because recruiting is included in "coaching".
3) NC St.
You were there 11 seasons. 5 of them you had losing seasons. 2 of them you were barely .500 (39 and 33). You made the post season 4/11 times with only 1 NT appearance. That means over half the time you were there, you were barely .500 or worse.
On a side note, while others live and die with only NT appearances and NT wins, I don't put much stock into them. Is getting knocked out in the second round really that much better than not making the NT at all? NT appearance and wins don't mean crap without rings. The object is to win the whole thing. Do you think the Buffalo Bills or Philadelphia Eagles think wins in the post season matter? Do you think Arizona under all the Lute Olson early exits saw them as a "success" in which to measure other teams by?
My main gripe is when someone has had that limited success with a Big 6 school, I don't see how you can bash someone else (especially when I never said a word to you). That's just my opinion. I think it's a major violation and it's sooo JV.
Now I've answered your questions. Please explain to me how comparing your resume to mine proves you're a "good coach". Your resume should stand alone and by itself, but for some reason, you, mlatsko, and the rest of the Mensa society feel the need to pull what I've done into to prove how you're a good coach.....when in reality, they have no correlation whatsoever.