| Name |
Yr. |
Pos. |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
TOT |
| Jean Newman |
So. |
C |
45 |
42 |
31 |
42 |
56 |
34 |
35 |
16 |
37 |
56 |
70 |
35 |
D- |
499 |
| Todd Ford |
Sr. |
SF |
28 |
50 |
17 |
89 |
42 |
36 |
28 |
40 |
12 |
66 |
80 |
54 |
C |
542 |
| |
|
|
17 |
-8 |
14 |
-47 |
14 |
-2 |
7 |
-24 |
25 |
-10 |
-10 |
-19 |
#VALUE! |
-43 |
I realize there will be people saying 'neither' which I am not particularly interested in. Taking into account differences in Durability and WE< their overall ratings seem similar. . would Newman's advantages in Ath, REB, BLK, Per and Pass be more valuable at SF than Ford's advantages in Speed, Defense, and BH?
Leaning towards Newman just based on the theory of :'Get rebounding in the lineup', but what about that BH?