Incorrect. I was not the only one concerned about it. What I'm concerned with is the way it was done, not that it was done. There was no public vote. There was the imaginary vote you had via site mail with no interest in having the vote done publicly. Why were you so afraid of a public vote if you had the support you claim you did? You didn't have that support in the world chat. Indifference is not support. Even one of your posse didn't say yes, he said he didn't care either way. Hardly a ringing endorsement.
The problem is that you took authority away from the league, and customer service said okay, don't do it again because it's wrong. Now that you stole the power, you don't have to ask for anything anymore. Their response is so retarded, it's not funny. Obama calls for marshall law, I assure you congress doesn't say ok, be sure to ask next time. THAT is the real issue. If you can get a public vote where the majority of non-committee owners give away their right to decide league issues, I will support it 100%. I told you that, I told admin that. Not sure why that is asking too much of anybody. Seems reasonable to me. Tell me what is unreasonable about it.
8/12/2010 1:14 PM (edited)