Line up help Topic

willowcards2
Posts: 216 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 27 6
Prospect
I am having a difficult time figuring out what my starting lineup should be. I promised my Fr. PF as starting spot. What would be my best lineup with this Fr. PF included?
Thanks
2/14/2011 6:17 PM
uglyskunk3
Posts: 550 (0)
Hall of Famer
156
Prospect
why did you promise a start to a pf with an ath rating of 14? i bet steve urkel has more athleticism. is he at least high potential in ath?
2/14/2011 6:37 PM
willowcards2
Posts: 216 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 27 6
Prospect

it was the 12th hour in recruiting and he was the best PF left and since he was a DII recruit and i am a DIII i am happy with him. Unless you have a positive post save me the hassle and time to read a post about urkel or anything else that has nothing to do with my question. i am trying to get better not laughed at.

2/14/2011 8:00 PM
car_crazy_v2
Posts: 619 (0)
All Star
32 3
Rookie
PG - Shifflett, Abrams
SG - Jones, Champion
SF - Ross, Henderson
PF - Larsen, Scheuerman
C - Chapman, Gilbert

Larsen really limits your flexibility, but try and play him as few minutes as possible if that is how you chose to substitute. If you sub by fatigue, I would only sub Scheuerman when he is "getting tired".
2/14/2011 8:43 PM
tianyi7886
Posts: 4243 (0)
Hall of Famer
51 33 282 40
Prospect
play target minutes rather than sub by fatigue, that will limit larsen to about 8-10 min.
2/14/2011 8:48 PM
uglyskunk3
Posts: 550 (0)
Hall of Famer
156
Prospect
just a heads up there is no way that was the best pf left. ath rating is kind of the most important rating so having a pf with a rating of 14 is not so good.
2/14/2011 8:52 PM
headpirate
Posts: 397 (0)
Hall of Famer
55 86 12
Rookie
Posted by uglyskunk3 on 2/14/2011 6:37:00 PM (view original):
why did you promise a start to a pf with an ath rating of 14? i bet steve urkel has more athleticism. is he at least high potential in ath?
I freakin' love trolling ugly's posts. i need to move to one of his conferences sometime. finally getting to enjoy the genius of colonels19.
2/14/2011 9:03 PM
uglyskunk3
Posts: 550 (0)
Hall of Famer
156
Prospect
Posted by headpirate on 2/14/2011 9:03:00 PM (view original):
Posted by uglyskunk3 on 2/14/2011 6:37:00 PM (view original):
why did you promise a start to a pf with an ath rating of 14? i bet steve urkel has more athleticism. is he at least high potential in ath?
I freakin' love trolling ugly's posts. i need to move to one of his conferences sometime. finally getting to enjoy the genius of colonels19.
you should worry more about winning games and less about posts. 
2/14/2011 9:13 PM
tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
Posted by headpirate on 2/14/2011 9:03:00 PM (view original):
Posted by uglyskunk3 on 2/14/2011 6:37:00 PM (view original):
why did you promise a start to a pf with an ath rating of 14? i bet steve urkel has more athleticism. is he at least high potential in ath?
I freakin' love trolling ugly's posts. i need to move to one of his conferences sometime. finally getting to enjoy the genius of colonels19.
The huge difference there is that ugly is an extremely good coach while colonels...well, isn't.  Sometimes I do wish US's posts wouldn't be so condescending, but most of the time he's right.  I would have to agree with assessment about the PF above, too.  I might just not start him and let him transfer because he's bringing the team down this year and with such low athleticism and no real great strength, he doesn't project out to be a game changer.  I say sit the guy and let him transfer.
2/14/2011 10:50 PM
willowcards2
Posts: 216 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 27 6
Prospect
THANKS TO ALL EXCEPT FOR UGLYSHUNK WHOSE CONDESCENDING WORDS ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING TO HELP 
2/15/2011 5:49 PM
uglyskunk3
Posts: 550 (0)
Hall of Famer
156
Prospect
Posted by willowcards2 on 2/15/2011 5:49:00 PM (view original):
THANKS TO ALL EXCEPT FOR UGLYSHUNK WHOSE CONDESCENDING WORDS ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING TO HELP 
behind the condescension is the truth. say thank you and be on your way. lol 
2/15/2011 9:48 PM
angmar
Posts: 219 (0)
Hall of Famer
141
Rookie
Posted by uglyskunk3 on 2/14/2011 8:52:00 PM (view original):
just a heads up there is no way that was the best pf left. ath rating is kind of the most important rating so having a pf with a rating of 14 is not so good.
Wait a minute, you've got a PF on your D2 team in Tark who is in his Junior season whose Athleticism is only at 32.  After 2 1/2 seasons, that's not real good either, is it?  Or am I missing something?
2/16/2011 9:39 PM
Line up help Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.