Which player is the better match-up? Topic

Motion offense/M2M defense.

Player 1: SR, IQ A/A
ATH: 60
SPD: 58
REB: 99
DEF: 94
BLK: 92
LP: 86
PER: 34
BH: 55
P: 54
ST: 88
FT: C+

Player 2: SO, IQ B+/B
ATH: 94
SPD: 65
REB: 83
DEF: 82
BLK: 62
LP: 81
PER: 23
BH: 65
P: 50
ST: 70
FT: B+

OPPOSING PLAYER: (MOTION/MAN) SR, IQ A/A
ATH: 94
SPD: 58
REB: 78
DEF: 99
BLK: 54
LP: 80
PER: 50
BH: 57
P: 55
ST: 99
FT: C-

My instincts are to go with the senior to match the other guy's IQ. My senior is also rated higher in DEF, REB and BLK. Opponent's player is listed as a SF, both mine are PF. Matchup takes place at the PF position. My worry is the huge ath difference between my senior and the enemy. This is what makes me wonder if I shouldn't give my athletic guy a shot, IQ be damned...


tl, dr: What is better for defense - DEF/SB and IQ or ATH
9/27/2011 6:14 AM

Im far from the top level of players on here but I think B+ is sufficient IQ and I think the opposing players ATH advantage with 99 defense will shut your guy down.  If you go with Player 2 his Ath matches up well, and has +10 BH...either way the SR will play though the SO only has 70 stamina.

9/28/2011 8:38 AM (edited)
actually the sophomore started and the senior played SF. He did foul out in 23 minutes, but held the guy to 13 pts (well, he and my b/u SF) and we won the game...
9/27/2011 10:32 PM
Posted by dacj501 on 9/27/2011 10:32:00 PM (view original):
actually the sophomore started and the senior played SF. He did foul out in 23 minutes, but held the guy to 13 pts (well, he and my b/u SF) and we won the game...
nice job I would have started the Sophmore too I forgot to specifically say that the last post haha
9/28/2011 8:37 AM
Which player is the better match-up? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.