Athleticism	42	Low		Perimeter	52	High
Speed	51	Low		Ball Handling	38	High
Rebounding	1	Low		Passing	41	High
Defense	16	Average		Stamina	78	Average
Shot Blocking	1	Low		Durability	44	Average
Low-post	11	High		FT Shooting		Low

Point guard 425 WE 50

Athleticism	30	Average		Perimeter	16	High
Speed	41	High		Ball Handling	25	High
Rebounding	40	Average		Passing	17	High
Defense	32	High		Stamina	60	High
Shot Blocking	38	Low		Durability	35	High
Low-post	57	High		FT Shooting		High

Power foward or Small forward 433 WE 42

Athleticism	32	High		Perimeter	1	Low
Speed	14	Low		Ball Handling	13	Low
Rebounding	58	High		Passing	23	Low
Defense	21	High		Stamina	64	Average
Shot Blocking	55	Average		Durability	29	High
Low-post	51	High		FT Shooting		Average

Center or Power foward 399 WE 38

Athleticism	36	Average		Perimeter	33	Low
Speed	39	Average		Ball Handling	22	Low
Rebounding	45	High		Passing	26	High
Defense	34	High		Stamina	62	Average
Shot Blocking	34	High		Durability	24	Low
Low-post	18	High		FT Shooting		Low

Power Forward 410 WE 37




By the way d3 C- prestige 

Only criticism is your PG's DEF is too low. Other than that, great job.

I would also say the PG's speed is too low as a fifty with low potential; Middle guy would be better at SF than PF due to rebounding,  The last guy could either be an OK d3 center for you, or a good one, depending on if those are just plain highs or high highs in ATH, reb, LP and DEF.

It sucks... Just kidding. Lol.

Good class Philly. I'd be very happy with that group.

#2 and #3 are very good, #1 is a little questionable with ath/spd both at low, and defense at 16. 

I know where your coming from with the point guard being at 16 for the defense but I wanted his offense and im changing to 2-3 zone so I will try to hide him.

I think you did fine, and considering this is wooden DIII recruiting out of New York, that bumps up your efforts a little bit. Not a big fan of #1 unless he has high-high PER in which case I think he'd be fine as a gunner off the bench once he's an upperclassman taking time at the 2 and the 3.

Posted by jpmills3 on 4/2/2012 9:39:00 AM (view original):
you might be able to get away with player no. 1 at SF, given his speed/ath (lack thereof).  no rebounding, but sometimes, depending on your post players, you can get away with it. 

#1 is 5"8 lol so im pretty sure he has to be a point guard.

Posted by phillyboy108 on 4/2/2012 11:25:00 AM (view original):

Posted by jpmills3 on 4/2/2012 9:39:00 AM (view original):
you might be able to get away with player no. 1 at SF, given his speed/ath (lack thereof).  no rebounding, but sometimes, depending on your post players, you can get away with it. 

#1 is 5"8 lol so im pretty sure he has to be a point guard.

Height doesn't matter - it's just window dressing. If the ratings are right, you can play any player at any position.

Height wont play a factor if I put him at small forward?

Nope...height is built in to the ratings.  it explains why he has a 1 rebounding, but a 7'0" player with a 1 in rebounding (none exist) has the same effect in the game as a 5'8" player with a 1 reb.

But taller players have better rebounding ratings in general.  But a 6'1" guard with a 20 reb is ALWAYS better at rebounding than a 6'4" guard with a 5 rebounding.

HS FT% is also directly correlated to a player's beginning FT grade, though.

updated new player tell me if you like him or not.

I'd give that a B...a lot of "high"s but it will take time.  work ethics low, will take longer to improve.  also no top notch athletes or speed, but good core values all the way around