FT Shooting Practice Topic

Hey what kind of minutes do you guys put into free throw shooting if they are maxed out. Can you drop it down to 5 or should you keep it around 8 or so? Opinions please...
4/11/2012 11:31 PM
I drop it to 1 like every other category when I get the maxed out message. I know some coaches keep it at 7 out of paranoia that a kid might be losing ability that's not as easily seen since the rating is a letter grade. 
4/11/2012 11:53 PM
0
4/12/2012 9:10 AM
Any more opinions????
4/12/2012 3:41 PM
if you drop it to 0 and then after you max out all the categories increase it back to 11 you will get another maxed out message, which implies to me that there is a tiny loss at 0
4/12/2012 3:42 PM
I've definitely had maxed out guys drop a shown letter grade with 0 minutes in FT.  Personally I like to keep it at 8 when it maxes (paranoia being the difference between 7 and 8).
4/12/2012 5:34 PM
Posted by spasticity on 4/12/2012 5:34:00 PM (view original):
I've definitely had maxed out guys drop a shown letter grade with 0 minutes in FT.  Personally I like to keep it at 8 when it maxes (paranoia being the difference between 7 and 8).
I've never had a guy lose a letter grade, but I'm still paranoid enough that I keep it at 8 after the maxed out message.  Every other category I go down to 0, but for some reason I don't do this for FTs.
4/13/2012 12:10 AM
Posted by fd343ny on 4/12/2012 3:42:00 PM (view original):
if you drop it to 0 and then after you max out all the categories increase it back to 11 you will get another maxed out message, which implies to me that there is a tiny loss at 0
there is a tiny loss at 0. no doubt about it.

the simple reality is the rate of improvement and decline are very closely linked. players have an improvement curve, from their starting point to the maximum. as you get higher, improvements (and declines) get smaller. when you get the maximum email, is the rate of improvement truly 0? nope. there is about a point left. similarly, the rate of decline is not 0. but it is very small

for the average player. a year of 0 practice at the capped message results in roughly .1 point lost. so if you have anything else you can improvement in, may as well go with 0.

in fact players with maybe 1-2 points to go, still many practices from their maxed message, should all be put to 0 if you have significant gains elsewhere -as you will still see maybe .25 decline for a year of 0 (and probably less, i am erring on the side of caution).

to the person who lost a grade of ft at 0 - no doubt - it is guaranteed to have happened by now, pretty many times. but i wouldn't take it to mean anything. say you hit a higher grade at 77.0%. some players max is going to be 77.05%, just like any other value. well, if you take that player, max em, and practice 0 for a year - you may see the decline - but don't be fooled, your new lower-grade player is maybe a 76.9% ft shooter now, and you would never notice the difference if not for that displayed grade change. its not like the guy lost a couple % .

4/13/2012 2:18 PM
I leave at it at 7 because every single percentage point makes a difference when it comes to FT shooting.
4/13/2012 11:19 PM
backing what gillispie said, why waste those minutes there if they can be used on someone who is blue in another category.  I would think the difference between 11 and 18 minutes in rebounding when it's in the blue would gain much more than the difference between 0 and 7 practice minutes for someone in free throws who is in the red would lose.  of course, if there's nowhere else to put those minutes because they are maxed everywhere, then I can see the argument for leaving some on FT practice
4/14/2012 7:49 AM
FT Shooting Practice Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.