How high to draft a guy with 48 Health Topic

VicFranco

Projects to 94-69-80-84-69  He should get close. but he projects to 48 Health, too

I have the 25th pick, so he should be gone by then, but I usually get guys I rate #7-#10 with picks in the 17-20 range.  I figure I'll get my 12th or 13th guy on my list at #25.

I have this guy currently as #8, would be higher if he was healthy.

I suppose he could fall to 25, perhaps.

I have pretty decent guys on my list between 9-15.  I'll get one of them.  Would you list this guy above them, hoping he doesn't blow two knees or something.

How much would the 48 Health scare you away from a .300-.310 bat?

It's scaring me some.

If I list him at #18, I'm pretty sure I'll draft a guy higher than him with my #25 pick. 

 I have  PerryAllen  8 or 9 spots below him.  He's a decent corner OF.  Would you take the risk on Franco or get something a bit decent for sure?  BTW, it is a weak bat draft, as you figured.

moe




 

6/7/2012 8:26 PM (edited)
health is the most hit and miss rating out there.  I put very little stock into it.  We have all had great guys with 90+ health go down for season ending injuries, and yet the crappy players with low health never seem to get those injuries.

Then again I believe in having 20 in both training and medical. 
6/7/2012 8:22 PM
I don't agree with the whole "hit and miss" assertion.

Top 10 pick, make sure he has good health.   After that, pick the best player.
6/7/2012 8:41 PM
I rate health very highly.  I will not draft a guy at any slot if it projects to lower than 75.  Just too much risk for me to cultivate and develop him through 4 minor league seasons hoping he doesn't hit a huge setback along the way.

I do keep both Training and Medical at or near 20M though, and have been known to sign a free agent for a couple of years with health of 40ish.  He is already projected at this point and I will take the risk then if he is productive enough.
6/7/2012 9:52 PM
Hardball Dynasty – Fantasy Baseball Sim Games - Player Profile: Gookie Munro is a good example of low health guys who are quite useful.   With his low DUR and 17 health, I knew he was going to start maybe 100 games and planned for it.    You have a 25 man roster and it's a bad idea to say "Oh no, low health = no way", IMO.
6/7/2012 10:16 PM
Posted by rangerup on 6/7/2012 9:52:00 PM (view original):
I rate health very highly.  I will not draft a guy at any slot if it projects to lower than 75.  Just too much risk for me to cultivate and develop him through 4 minor league seasons hoping he doesn't hit a huge setback along the way.

I do keep both Training and Medical at or near 20M though, and have been known to sign a free agent for a couple of years with health of 40ish.  He is already projected at this point and I will take the risk then if he is productive enough.
With 20/20 T & M, I think you're missing out on some quality if your low-bar for health is 75.  I'd say that 60-65 is still borderline too conservative.
6/7/2012 10:33 PM
Depends on if it's a pitcher or a position player. 48 position player health is probably fine provided you can live with the likely hood of a 10-15 day injury once every couple of seasons, 48 health for a pitcher likely means at least one season ending injury along the line.
6/8/2012 6:02 AM
Posted by tecwrg on 6/7/2012 10:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rangerup on 6/7/2012 9:52:00 PM (view original):
I rate health very highly.  I will not draft a guy at any slot if it projects to lower than 75.  Just too much risk for me to cultivate and develop him through 4 minor league seasons hoping he doesn't hit a huge setback along the way.

I do keep both Training and Medical at or near 20M though, and have been known to sign a free agent for a couple of years with health of 40ish.  He is already projected at this point and I will take the risk then if he is productive enough.
With 20/20 T & M, I think you're missing out on some quality if your low-bar for health is 75.  I'd say that 60-65 is still borderline too conservative.
I know I am.  I'm just not willing to take the heartbreak risk of a guy I am counting on going down.  But I do envy those owners that pay big bucks to a 35 health guy and manage to get all year out of him with no injuries.
6/8/2012 5:27 PM
Posted by rangerup on 6/8/2012 5:27:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 6/7/2012 10:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rangerup on 6/7/2012 9:52:00 PM (view original):
I rate health very highly.  I will not draft a guy at any slot if it projects to lower than 75.  Just too much risk for me to cultivate and develop him through 4 minor league seasons hoping he doesn't hit a huge setback along the way.

I do keep both Training and Medical at or near 20M though, and have been known to sign a free agent for a couple of years with health of 40ish.  He is already projected at this point and I will take the risk then if he is productive enough.
With 20/20 T & M, I think you're missing out on some quality if your low-bar for health is 75.  I'd say that 60-65 is still borderline too conservative.
I know I am.  I'm just not willing to take the heartbreak risk of a guy I am counting on going down.  But I do envy those owners that pay big bucks to a 35 health guy and manage to get all year out of him with no injuries.
Allow me to introduce you to the all-time low-health anomaly, Hall of Famer  Hardball Dynasty – Fantasy Baseball Sim Games - Player Profile: Bill Hall.
6/8/2012 6:55 PM
Posted by tecwrg on 6/7/2012 10:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rangerup on 6/7/2012 9:52:00 PM (view original):
I rate health very highly.  I will not draft a guy at any slot if it projects to lower than 75.  Just too much risk for me to cultivate and develop him through 4 minor league seasons hoping he doesn't hit a huge setback along the way.

I do keep both Training and Medical at or near 20M though, and have been known to sign a free agent for a couple of years with health of 40ish.  He is already projected at this point and I will take the risk then if he is productive enough.
With 20/20 T & M, I think you're missing out on some quality if your low-bar for health is 75.  I'd say that 60-65 is still borderline too conservative.
rangerup wouldn't touch Hardball Dynasty – Fantasy Baseball Sim Games - Player Profile: Roger Hosmer with a 10-foot pole; 4 Cy-Youngs & 6 All-Star Appearances by 27 be-damned.
6/8/2012 7:13 PM
Just depends on your tolerance for pain. I draft, sign and trade for low health guys and once in a while it bites me in the ***.
6/8/2012 9:21 PM
My feeling falls pretty closely in line with MikeT on this one:  If I'm drafting really high, I worry about health more, because I would rather have less risk with a slighly lower-level All-Star player than high risk (40-50ish health) better player.  But if I'm drafting in the late teens, 20's, 30's, deciding between an all-star that will be on the DL every now and again vs. a guy I'll plug in my lineup and always be looking to replace, or a backup.... that isn't even a question.  I can find those replacement level guys anywhere for little cost.
6/8/2012 9:29 PM
Posted by Crump123 on 6/8/2012 6:02:00 AM (view original):
Depends on if it's a pitcher or a position player. 48 position player health is probably fine provided you can live with the likely hood of a 10-15 day injury once every couple of seasons, 48 health for a pitcher likely means at least one season ending injury along the line.
+1;  the frequency of career-altering injuries is very different by position.

I would nearly completely disregard the 48 health rating for a COF/1B type, except that he'll miss 20 games or so every other year; they rarely get catastrophic injuries.  For a pitcher I would drop him well down the list depending on who else is on the list; I would expect a 48 health pitcher to have a career-altering injury every several seasons (although you could get lucky), and for an up-the-middle guy I'd drop him a little bit as they seem to get career altering injuries more often than corners do.
6/9/2012 3:56 PM
Posted by kcden on 6/8/2012 7:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 6/7/2012 10:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rangerup on 6/7/2012 9:52:00 PM (view original):
I rate health very highly.  I will not draft a guy at any slot if it projects to lower than 75.  Just too much risk for me to cultivate and develop him through 4 minor league seasons hoping he doesn't hit a huge setback along the way.

I do keep both Training and Medical at or near 20M though, and have been known to sign a free agent for a couple of years with health of 40ish.  He is already projected at this point and I will take the risk then if he is productive enough.
With 20/20 T & M, I think you're missing out on some quality if your low-bar for health is 75.  I'd say that 60-65 is still borderline too conservative.
rangerup wouldn't touch Hardball Dynasty – Fantasy Baseball Sim Games - Player Profile: Roger Hosmer with a 10-foot pole; 4 Cy-Youngs & 6 All-Star Appearances by 27 be-damned.
I wouldn't draft that guy, no.  I would give him a FA contract though.
6/10/2012 10:50 AM
How high to draft a guy with 48 Health Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.