I have a continuing debate with myself that I thought I'd like to open up to public forum. I'm a big fan of non-traditional lineups based on numbers analysis (such as:
Baseball Musings). I'm susceptible to the line of thought that prefers building lineups from highest OBP in the 1st spot, to lowest OBP in the 9th, with some caveats.
But I also think OBP doesn't tell you quite everything you want to know about where to put a hitter. A high-OBP hitter who's slow or a bad baserunner can clog up the basepaths or just miss opportunities to score from second on a single. I currently have a perfect example on one of my teams, and I'm trying to figure out where to fit him in my lineup:
Randy Waters. .400+ cumulative OBP, but 28 speed and 49 base-running add up to a not-so-impressive run totals for his first to years.
I had him batting 2nd or 3rd for those first two seasons, but he only scored 88 and 76 runs on a top-5ish offense, while hitters with less impressive OBP (
Ned Bailey, for example) scored many more runs, with comparable or better RBI numbers.
This season, I decided to bump Waters down. But where should I put him? He's obviously a very valuable contact hitter, and because he takes BB, also useful at keeping an inning going, even when he doesn't get a hit. I'm thinking of putting him 6th.
Right now, my vs RHP lineup looks like this:
Bailey
Nen
Gao
Hart
Ladendorf
Waters
Rios
Pitcher
Rolle
Thoughts? I'm not sure if I should put Waters before or after the big slugger Ladendorf. I'm also not quite sure to do with the 3rd spot in the lineup. I'm working off the theory that the 3rd spot sees the fewest opportunities with men-on-base, so I've only been putting my 5th or 6th best hitter there.
1/24/2014 3:55 PM (edited)